diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | the_philosophy_commune.html | 47 |
1 files changed, 46 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/the_philosophy_commune.html b/the_philosophy_commune.html index 4da7fb7..d245e91 100644 --- a/the_philosophy_commune.html +++ b/the_philosophy_commune.html @@ -190,7 +190,52 @@ table { <td> <h2 id="dialectics">The dialectics</h2> <p> - Still to come + I am not going to go much into dialectics because + A: The abstract shit I went into has the infomation you need to know to understand dialectics. + B: You can watch a fucking youtube video you fucker. To sum things up with dialectics we + describe the relationship between different things to understand them. + <br/><br/> + To understand Marx's dialectics we need to understand idealism vs materialism. Karl Marx + read lots of Hegel (the old dude no one understands) and Hegel was very idealist and his + idealism is all about the mind and spirit and how they shape reality. Idealists believe + that everything around us is shaped by are own mind. "If a tree falls and no one is + around to hear it does it make a sound?" is a common question used to bring forward + idealist ideas because it shows that senory feelings exist in the mind and not in + the world around us and that every single thing we see and feel is in are mind and + not the world around us. Materialism is about the world around us and believes + that matter is the base of reality. Vulgar materialism as blunty as possible + states that everything is just matter and a common example of vulgar materialism + is kicking a stone to prove its existance. Karl Marx is a materialist but not + a vulgar materialist. For understanding things vulgar materialism really + isn't that helpful. + <br/><br/> + Karl Marx's dialectical materialism is often thought of a materialist version + of Hegel's dialectics though I like to think of it as more of a dialectic + between idealism and materialism being applied on other things as a way to understand the + world. Karl Marx applied his dialectical materialism to history to create historical materialism. + Its a view of history where instead of being centered around the actions of one great + leader or key events like some big ass battle its more about different ideas floating around, + ideas things and people interacting with each other, changes in conditions in the world... + Karl Marx believes that people are shaped by there envirtment and not just destined to be + something. A rich man is rich because he was born into a rich family, was in the right place + at the right time... and not because he "had that rich chad alpha mindset and pulled himself + up by the bootstraps". Karl Marx isn't discrediting anyones work put + into something but more of saying that the conditions someone is in is important to how + they grow as a person and how there effort interacts with the world. + <br/></br> + A good example is trumps "small loan" of a million dollars. He brags about building up his company + from a loan of a million dollars to make it sound like he was a average guy who + built up a empire from hardwork and mindset alone when really being able to + grow up seeing how his dad handles real estate and getting to met other people + in that business and having his family name as a symbol is priceless and really + impacts the future of someone. Somone growing up in a average household isn't + going to get to learn all the insider secrets of real estate at a young age + in a time without internet then grow up to be given a loan of money bigger then + any amount any normal person will ever touch to apply there knowledge to conitnue + spreading the family empire. + <br/><br/> + A did a TERRIBLE job with Marx's dialectics so please read Marx's shit instead of taking + my word on anything. I am a tired lazy fuck that isn't to be trusted about anything. </p> </td> </tr> |