aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/org/blog/articles/the-software-design-crisis.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'org/blog/articles/the-software-design-crisis.txt')
-rw-r--r--org/blog/articles/the-software-design-crisis.txt85
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 85 deletions
diff --git a/org/blog/articles/the-software-design-crisis.txt b/org/blog/articles/the-software-design-crisis.txt
deleted file mode 100644
index 96b0ede..0000000
--- a/org/blog/articles/the-software-design-crisis.txt
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,85 +0,0 @@
-**Warning: this is more of a roast if anything**
-
-Have you ever had an update for a piece of software that removes features
-without any usable replacement or way to get it back? What about options being
-pulled from the setting? Don't get me started on desktop software using mobile
-UI design.
-
-### Mobile UI design leaking into desktop space
-
-Mobile phones are operated with touch screen, and have screens that are small
-and taller than they are wide. Desktops are operated with a keyboard and
-mouse, and have large screens that are wider than they are tall. Because of
-that, its quite safe to say that **software optimized for one platform isnt't
-so great on another**. Are you still following? Likely not, but if you are
-consider this: why do many modern desktop programs look like mobile apps? Some
-of them are mobile apps ported to desktop though many of them don't even work
-on mobile. The answers are modern UX, the web, and _GNOMEism_.
-
-### Modern UX
-
-**Modern UX isn't about making professional software. It's about making
-software that looks like it was made by a professional.** This means flat
-interfaces and lack of customization. Modern developers are like super
-entitled chefs. "How dare you put table salt on a meal that is already
-perfect", "ketchup? what are you a picky eater?!"... They act like your lucky
-for even getting a dark and light mode when the toolkits they use have
-themeing. Yes, I know adding more options makes it difficult to debug but hear
-me out: all the basic things can be in the settings menu while everything else
-can be in a config file or interface similar to _about:config_. The normies
-get their easy settings while power users can change what they want. For
-separate mobile and desktop interfaces use a [model-view-
-controller](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Model%E2%80%93view%E2%80%93controller).
-**The UI is nearly how the user interacts with the program, not the program
-itself.** MVC allows you to isolated different parts of your program making it
-more flexible. Before you go saying MVC is too difficult I had a teacher who
-made us use MVC in a beginner course with some students who never programmed
-before. By the end we were all able to design and make software this way. What
-do you tell users on closed source platforms that actively make development
-harder? **Go fuck yourself.**
-
-### The web
-
-The web uses html, css, and javascript. The first two being usable standards
-for creating webpages, and the third being a buggy programming language
-integrated into the first two. Many developers decided to use those to make
-software since its cross platform and doesn't require the user to install
-their software. Though web apps have issues with bandwidth, security, and
-integration into operating systems. They encouraged mass produced slop. Web
-architecture has spyware built in by design by governments and corporations.
-The fixes include disabling javascript, cookies, webrtc, webgl... Though these
-are things web apps depend on, **because its spyware by design**. This website
-doesn't depend on those things. All it needs is html and optional css. This
-ties into modern UX design since web developers like to define new standards
-that are worse than the long standing ones. What about new standards that are
-better than the old ones? Web developers never do that. This is because **web
-developers aren't software engineers yet their choices effect the software
-development world since they create much of the software normies use which
-creates expectations for what modern software should look like**.
-
-### GNOMEism
-
-Gnome is a desktop envirtment that is pretty much standard on linux. A while
-back they said [ please don't theme our apps](https://stopthemingmy.app/).
-Sounds a lot like the entitled chef thing I brought up rofl. Someone made [ do
-not resize our windows](https://webb.is-a.dev/do-not-resize/) as a parody of
-gnome. People thought it was real because **it strangely sounds like something
-gnome developers would actually say**. Gnome tries to strike a fine balance
-between mobile and desktop platforms and ends up failing at both. Want to know
-what linux desktop has the most amount of forks? Its gnome! Sure that's a
-given since its the most common desktop but just compare it to kde forks for a
-sense of scale.
-
-### Accessibly
-
-This isn't really something most developers think of yet is one of the most
-important things in software development. You software developers are all dumb
-fucks but please stay away from doing anything hacky on the UI side. It can
-really fuck over things like screen readers. **The UI is nearly how the user
-interacts with the program, not the program itself.** Just pick a UI toolkit
-that fits your needs and use it in a sane manner and things will work
-correctly. Software developers a lot like web developers but not to the same
-degree create problems for themselves that once fixed created two more
-problems. When accessibly is already low on their list and that is how they
-work things will for sure be a shit show.
-