From f748cdb4d72d9f1761bc5aab3987bcaf40357a5c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: nathan <nathansmith@disroot.org>
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2025 14:38:27 -0600
Subject: Software design blog done

---
 org/blog/articles.xml                            |   7 ++
 org/blog/articles/the-software-design-crisis.txt |  85 ++++++++++++++++++
 org/blog/articles/the-software-design-crisis.xml |  47 ++++++++--
 org/blog/feed.xml                                | 109 +++++++++++++++++++++++
 org/blog/gophermap                               |   1 +
 org/blog/index.xhtml                             | 107 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 6 files changed, 349 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 org/blog/articles/the-software-design-crisis.txt

diff --git a/org/blog/articles.xml b/org/blog/articles.xml
index 20862ac..e93ae86 100644
--- a/org/blog/articles.xml
+++ b/org/blog/articles.xml
@@ -1,4 +1,11 @@
 <channel>
+  <item>
+    <title>The software design crisis</title>
+    <name>software-design</name>
+    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2025 20:37:38 GMT</pubDate>
+    <file>articles/the-software-design-crisis.xml</file>
+  </item>
+  
   <item>
     <title>Depression</title>
     <name>depression</name>
diff --git a/org/blog/articles/the-software-design-crisis.txt b/org/blog/articles/the-software-design-crisis.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..96b0ede
--- /dev/null
+++ b/org/blog/articles/the-software-design-crisis.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,85 @@
+**Warning: this is more of a roast if anything**
+
+Have you ever had an update for a piece of software that removes features
+without any usable replacement or way to get it back? What about options being
+pulled from the setting? Don't get me started on desktop software using mobile
+UI design.
+
+### Mobile UI design leaking into desktop space
+
+Mobile phones are operated with touch screen, and have screens that are small
+and taller than they are wide. Desktops are operated with a keyboard and
+mouse, and have large screens that are wider than they are tall. Because of
+that, its quite safe to say that **software optimized for one platform isnt't
+so great on another**. Are you still following? Likely not, but if you are
+consider this: why do many modern desktop programs look like mobile apps? Some
+of them are mobile apps ported to desktop though many of them don't even work
+on mobile. The answers are modern UX, the web, and _GNOMEism_.
+
+### Modern UX
+
+**Modern UX isn't about making professional software. It's about making
+software that looks like it was made by a professional.** This means flat
+interfaces and lack of customization. Modern developers are like super
+entitled chefs. "How dare you put table salt on a meal that is already
+perfect", "ketchup? what are you a picky eater?!"... They act like your lucky
+for even getting a dark and light mode when the toolkits they use have
+themeing. Yes, I know adding more options makes it difficult to debug but hear
+me out: all the basic things can be in the settings menu while everything else
+can be in a config file or interface similar to _about:config_. The normies
+get their easy settings while power users can change what they want. For
+separate mobile and desktop interfaces use a [model-view-
+controller](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Model%E2%80%93view%E2%80%93controller).
+**The UI is nearly how the user interacts with the program, not the program
+itself.** MVC allows you to isolated different parts of your program making it
+more flexible. Before you go saying MVC is too difficult I had a teacher who
+made us use MVC in a beginner course with some students who never programmed
+before. By the end we were all able to design and make software this way. What
+do you tell users on closed source platforms that actively make development
+harder? **Go fuck yourself.**
+
+### The web
+
+The web uses html, css, and javascript. The first two being usable standards
+for creating webpages, and the third being a buggy programming language
+integrated into the first two. Many developers decided to use those to make
+software since its cross platform and doesn't require the user to install
+their software. Though web apps have issues with bandwidth, security, and
+integration into operating systems. They encouraged mass produced slop. Web
+architecture has spyware built in by design by governments and corporations.
+The fixes include disabling javascript, cookies, webrtc, webgl... Though these
+are things web apps depend on, **because its spyware by design**. This website
+doesn't depend on those things. All it needs is html and optional css. This
+ties into modern UX design since web developers like to define new standards
+that are worse than the long standing ones. What about new standards that are
+better than the old ones? Web developers never do that. This is because **web
+developers aren't software engineers yet their choices effect the software
+development world since they create much of the software normies use which
+creates expectations for what modern software should look like**.
+
+### GNOMEism
+
+Gnome is a desktop envirtment that is pretty much standard on linux. A while
+back they said [ please don't theme our apps](https://stopthemingmy.app/).
+Sounds a lot like the entitled chef thing I brought up rofl. Someone made [ do
+not resize our windows](https://webb.is-a.dev/do-not-resize/) as a parody of
+gnome. People thought it was real because **it strangely sounds like something
+gnome developers would actually say**. Gnome tries to strike a fine balance
+between mobile and desktop platforms and ends up failing at both. Want to know
+what linux desktop has the most amount of forks? Its gnome! Sure that's a
+given since its the most common desktop but just compare it to kde forks for a
+sense of scale.
+
+### Accessibly
+
+This isn't really something most developers think of yet is one of the most
+important things in software development. You software developers are all dumb
+fucks but please stay away from doing anything hacky on the UI side. It can
+really fuck over things like screen readers. **The UI is nearly how the user
+interacts with the program, not the program itself.** Just pick a UI toolkit
+that fits your needs and use it in a sane manner and things will work
+correctly. Software developers a lot like web developers but not to the same
+degree create problems for themselves that once fixed created two more
+problems. When accessibly is already low on their list and that is how they
+work things will for sure be a shit show.
+
diff --git a/org/blog/articles/the-software-design-crisis.xml b/org/blog/articles/the-software-design-crisis.xml
index fbce77a..7e31b9a 100644
--- a/org/blog/articles/the-software-design-crisis.xml
+++ b/org/blog/articles/the-software-design-crisis.xml
@@ -1,8 +1,13 @@
 <article>
-  Have you ever had an update for a piece of software that removes features
-  without any usable replacement or way to get it back? What about options
-  being pulled from the setting? Don't get me started on desktop software using
-  mobile UI design.
+  <p>
+    <b>Warning: this is more of a roast if anything</b>
+  </p>
+  <p>
+    Have you ever had an update for a piece of software that removes features
+    without any usable replacement or way to get it back? What about options
+    being pulled from the setting? Don't get me started on desktop software
+    using mobile UI design.
+  </p>
 
   <h3>Mobile UI design leaking into desktop space</h3>
   <p>
@@ -32,11 +37,13 @@
     can change what they want. For separate mobile and desktop interfaces use a
     <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Model%E2%80%93view%E2%80%93controller"
        target="_blank">model-view-controller</a>. <b>The UI is nearly how the
-    user interacts with the program, not the program itself.</b> CMV allows you
+    user interacts with the program, not the program itself.</b> MVC allows you
     to isolated different parts of your program making it more flexible. Before
-    you go saying CMV is too difficult I had a teacher who made us use CMV in a
+    you go saying MVC is too difficult I had a teacher who made us use MVC in a
     beginner course with some students who never programmed before. By the end
-    we were all able to design and make software this way.
+    we were all able to design and make software this way. What do you tell
+    users on closed source platforms that actively make development harder?
+    <b>Go fuck yourself.</b>
   </p>
 
   <h3>The web</h3>
@@ -62,5 +69,31 @@
 
   <h3>GNOMEism</h3>
   <p>
+    Gnome is a desktop envirtment that is pretty much standard on linux. A
+    while back they said <a href="https://stopthemingmy.app/" target="_blank">
+    please don't theme our apps</a>. Sounds a lot like the entitled chef thing
+    I brought up rofl. Someone made
+    <a href="https://webb.is-a.dev/do-not-resize/" target="_blank">
+    do not resize our windows</a>
+    as a parody of gnome. People thought it was real because <b>it strangely
+    sounds like something gnome developers would actually say</b>. Gnome tries
+    to strike a fine balance between mobile and desktop platforms and ends up
+    failing at both. Want to know what linux desktop has the most amount of
+    forks? Its gnome! Sure that's a given since its the most common desktop but
+    just compare it to kde forks for a sense of scale.
+  </p>
+
+  <h3>Accessibly</h3>
+  <p>
+    This isn't really something most developers think of yet is one of the most
+    important things in software development. You software developers are all
+    dumb fucks but please stay away from doing anything hacky on the UI
+    side. It can really fuck over things like screen readers. <b>The UI is
+    nearly how the user interacts with the program, not the program itself.</b>
+    Just pick a UI toolkit that fits your needs and use it in a sane manner and
+    things will work correctly. Software developers a lot like web developers
+    but not to the same degree create problems for themselves that once fixed
+    created two more problems. When accessibly is already low on their list and
+    that is how they work things will for sure be a shit show.
   </p>
 </article>
diff --git a/org/blog/feed.xml b/org/blog/feed.xml
index db31428..6d3942b 100644
--- a/org/blog/feed.xml
+++ b/org/blog/feed.xml
@@ -10,6 +10,115 @@
       <link>https://shittyweb.org/blog</link>
     </image>
 
+    <item>
+        <title>The software design crisis</title>
+        <link>https://shittyweb.org/blog#software-design</link>
+        <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2025 20:37:38 GMT</pubDate>
+        <description>
+<![CDATA[
+<article>
+  <p>
+    <b>Warning: this is more of a roast if anything</b>
+  </p>
+  <p>
+    Have you ever had an update for a piece of software that removes features
+    without any usable replacement or way to get it back? What about options
+    being pulled from the setting? Don't get me started on desktop software
+    using mobile UI design.
+  </p>
+
+  <h3>Mobile UI design leaking into desktop space</h3>
+  <p>
+    Mobile phones are operated with touch screen, and have screens that are
+    small and taller than they are wide. Desktops are operated with a keyboard
+    and mouse, and have large screens that are wider than they are
+    tall. Because of that, its quite safe to say that <b>software optimized for
+    one platform isnt't so great on another</b>. Are you still following?
+    Likely not, but if you are consider this: why do many modern desktop
+    programs look like mobile apps? Some of them are mobile apps ported to
+    desktop though many of them don't even work on mobile. The answers are
+    modern UX, the web, and <i>GNOMEism</i>.
+  </p>
+
+  <h3>Modern UX</h3>
+  <p>
+    <b>Modern UX isn't about making professional software. It's about making
+    software that looks like it was made by a professional.</b> This means flat
+    interfaces and lack of customization. Modern developers are like super
+    entitled chefs. "How dare you put table salt on a meal that is already
+    perfect", "ketchup? what are you a picky eater?!"... They act like your
+    lucky for even getting a dark and light mode when the toolkits they use
+    have themeing. Yes, I know adding more options makes it difficult to debug
+    but hear me out: all the basic things can be in the settings menu while
+    everything else can be in a config file or interface similar to
+    <i>about:config</i>. The normies get their easy settings while power users
+    can change what they want. For separate mobile and desktop interfaces use a
+    <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Model%E2%80%93view%E2%80%93controller"
+       target="_blank">model-view-controller</a>. <b>The UI is nearly how the
+    user interacts with the program, not the program itself.</b> MVC allows you
+    to isolated different parts of your program making it more flexible. Before
+    you go saying MVC is too difficult I had a teacher who made us use MVC in a
+    beginner course with some students who never programmed before. By the end
+    we were all able to design and make software this way. What do you tell
+    users on closed source platforms that actively make development harder?
+    <b>Go fuck yourself.</b>
+  </p>
+
+  <h3>The web</h3>
+  <p>
+    The web uses html, css, and javascript. The first two being usable
+    standards for creating webpages, and the third being a buggy programming
+    language integrated into the first two. Many developers decided to use
+    those to make software since its cross platform and doesn't require the
+    user to install their software. Though web apps have issues with bandwidth,
+    security, and integration into operating systems. They encouraged mass
+    produced slop. Web architecture has spyware built in by design by
+    governments and corporations. The fixes include disabling javascript,
+    cookies, webrtc, webgl... Though these are things web apps depend
+    on, <b>because its spyware by design</b>. This website doesn't depend on
+    those things. All it needs is html and optional css. This ties into modern
+    UX design since web developers like to define new standards that are worse
+    than the long standing ones. What about new standards that are better than
+    the old ones? Web developers never do that. This is because <b>web
+    developers aren't software engineers yet their choices effect the software
+    development world since they create much of the software normies use which
+    creates expectations for what modern software should look like</b>.
+  </p>
+
+  <h3>GNOMEism</h3>
+  <p>
+    Gnome is a desktop envirtment that is pretty much standard on linux. A
+    while back they said <a href="https://stopthemingmy.app/" target="_blank">
+    please don't theme our apps</a>. Sounds a lot like the entitled chef thing
+    I brought up rofl. Someone made
+    <a href="https://webb.is-a.dev/do-not-resize/" target="_blank">
+    do not resize our windows</a>
+    as a parody of gnome. People thought it was real because <b>it strangely
+    sounds like something gnome developers would actually say</b>. Gnome tries
+    to strike a fine balance between mobile and desktop platforms and ends up
+    failing at both. Want to know what linux desktop has the most amount of
+    forks? Its gnome! Sure that's a given since its the most common desktop but
+    just compare it to kde forks for a sense of scale.
+  </p>
+
+  <h3>Accessibly</h3>
+  <p>
+    This isn't really something most developers think of yet is one of the most
+    important things in software development. You software developers are all
+    dumb fucks but please stay away from doing anything hacky on the UI
+    side. It can really fuck over things like screen readers. <b>The UI is
+    nearly how the user interacts with the program, not the program itself.</b>
+    Just pick a UI toolkit that fits your needs and use it in a sane manner and
+    things will work correctly. Software developers a lot like web developers
+    but not to the same degree create problems for themselves that once fixed
+    created two more problems. When accessibly is already low on their list and
+    that is how they work things will for sure be a shit show.
+  </p>
+</article>
+]]>
+        </description>
+    </item>
+
     <item>
         <title>Depression</title>
         <link>https://shittyweb.org/blog#depression</link>
diff --git a/org/blog/gophermap b/org/blog/gophermap
index dcea379..e2d1af4 100644
--- a/org/blog/gophermap
+++ b/org/blog/gophermap
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
+0Thu, 07 Aug 2025 20:37:38 GMT - The software design crisis	articles/the-software-design-crisis.txt
 0Tue, 05 Aug 2025 13:38:49 GMT - Depression	articles/depression.txt
 0Wed, 30 Jul 2025 05:19:56 GMT - The current state of crypto	articles/current-state-of-crypto.txt
 0Fri, 20 Jun 2025 07:27:02 GMT - Things I say	articles/things-i-say.txt
diff --git a/org/blog/index.xhtml b/org/blog/index.xhtml
index c56b9ce..49a0998 100644
--- a/org/blog/index.xhtml
+++ b/org/blog/index.xhtml
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
     </p>
     <div id="content-list">
       <ul>
+    <li><a href="#software-design">The software design crisis</a></li>
     <li><a href="#depression">Depression</a></li>
     <li><a href="#current-state-of-crypto">The current state of crypto</a></li>
     <li><a href="#things-i-say">Things I say</a></li>
@@ -50,6 +51,112 @@
 
     <br />
 <hr />
+<div class="container">
+  <div class="article-header">
+    <h2 id="software-design">The software design crisis</h2>--- Thu, 07 Aug 2025 20:37:38 GMT
+  </div>
+
+  <p>
+    <b>Warning: this is more of a roast if anything</b>
+  </p>
+  <p>
+    Have you ever had an update for a piece of software that removes features
+    without any usable replacement or way to get it back? What about options
+    being pulled from the setting? Don't get me started on desktop software
+    using mobile UI design.
+  </p>
+
+  <h3>Mobile UI design leaking into desktop space</h3>
+  <p>
+    Mobile phones are operated with touch screen, and have screens that are
+    small and taller than they are wide. Desktops are operated with a keyboard
+    and mouse, and have large screens that are wider than they are
+    tall. Because of that, its quite safe to say that <b>software optimized for
+    one platform isnt't so great on another</b>. Are you still following?
+    Likely not, but if you are consider this: why do many modern desktop
+    programs look like mobile apps? Some of them are mobile apps ported to
+    desktop though many of them don't even work on mobile. The answers are
+    modern UX, the web, and <i>GNOMEism</i>.
+  </p>
+
+  <h3>Modern UX</h3>
+  <p>
+    <b>Modern UX isn't about making professional software. It's about making
+    software that looks like it was made by a professional.</b> This means flat
+    interfaces and lack of customization. Modern developers are like super
+    entitled chefs. "How dare you put table salt on a meal that is already
+    perfect", "ketchup? what are you a picky eater?!"... They act like your
+    lucky for even getting a dark and light mode when the toolkits they use
+    have themeing. Yes, I know adding more options makes it difficult to debug
+    but hear me out: all the basic things can be in the settings menu while
+    everything else can be in a config file or interface similar to
+    <i>about:config</i>. The normies get their easy settings while power users
+    can change what they want. For separate mobile and desktop interfaces use a
+    <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Model%E2%80%93view%E2%80%93controller"
+       target="_blank">model-view-controller</a>. <b>The UI is nearly how the
+    user interacts with the program, not the program itself.</b> MVC allows you
+    to isolated different parts of your program making it more flexible. Before
+    you go saying MVC is too difficult I had a teacher who made us use MVC in a
+    beginner course with some students who never programmed before. By the end
+    we were all able to design and make software this way. What do you tell
+    users on closed source platforms that actively make development harder?
+    <b>Go fuck yourself.</b>
+  </p>
+
+  <h3>The web</h3>
+  <p>
+    The web uses html, css, and javascript. The first two being usable
+    standards for creating webpages, and the third being a buggy programming
+    language integrated into the first two. Many developers decided to use
+    those to make software since its cross platform and doesn't require the
+    user to install their software. Though web apps have issues with bandwidth,
+    security, and integration into operating systems. They encouraged mass
+    produced slop. Web architecture has spyware built in by design by
+    governments and corporations. The fixes include disabling javascript,
+    cookies, webrtc, webgl... Though these are things web apps depend
+    on, <b>because its spyware by design</b>. This website doesn't depend on
+    those things. All it needs is html and optional css. This ties into modern
+    UX design since web developers like to define new standards that are worse
+    than the long standing ones. What about new standards that are better than
+    the old ones? Web developers never do that. This is because <b>web
+    developers aren't software engineers yet their choices effect the software
+    development world since they create much of the software normies use which
+    creates expectations for what modern software should look like</b>.
+  </p>
+
+  <h3>GNOMEism</h3>
+  <p>
+    Gnome is a desktop envirtment that is pretty much standard on linux. A
+    while back they said <a href="https://stopthemingmy.app/" target="_blank">
+    please don't theme our apps</a>. Sounds a lot like the entitled chef thing
+    I brought up rofl. Someone made
+    <a href="https://webb.is-a.dev/do-not-resize/" target="_blank">
+    do not resize our windows</a>
+    as a parody of gnome. People thought it was real because <b>it strangely
+    sounds like something gnome developers would actually say</b>. Gnome tries
+    to strike a fine balance between mobile and desktop platforms and ends up
+    failing at both. Want to know what linux desktop has the most amount of
+    forks? Its gnome! Sure that's a given since its the most common desktop but
+    just compare it to kde forks for a sense of scale.
+  </p>
+
+  <h3>Accessibly</h3>
+  <p>
+    This isn't really something most developers think of yet is one of the most
+    important things in software development. You software developers are all
+    dumb fucks but please stay away from doing anything hacky on the UI
+    side. It can really fuck over things like screen readers. <b>The UI is
+    nearly how the user interacts with the program, not the program itself.</b>
+    Just pick a UI toolkit that fits your needs and use it in a sane manner and
+    things will work correctly. Software developers a lot like web developers
+    but not to the same degree create problems for themselves that once fixed
+    created two more problems. When accessibly is already low on their list and
+    that is how they work things will for sure be a shit show.
+  </p>
+
+</div>
+<br />
+<hr />
 <div class="container">
   <div class="article-header">
     <h2 id="depression">Depression</h2>--- Tue, 05 Aug 2025 13:38:49 GMT
-- 
cgit v1.2.3