From c60783ca7f6306f5cce55deaa83a3a701d921d28 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: nathan <nathansmith@disroot.org>
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2025 04:23:35 -0600
Subject: Working on new blog post

---
 org/blog/articles/the-ideology-of-comprise.xml | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 org/blog/articles/the-ideology-of-comprise.xml

(limited to 'org/blog')

diff --git a/org/blog/articles/the-ideology-of-comprise.xml b/org/blog/articles/the-ideology-of-comprise.xml
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..5e3e354
--- /dev/null
+++ b/org/blog/articles/the-ideology-of-comprise.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
+<article>
+  <h2>Syme</h2>
+  <p>
+    No no sillyo. I am not talking about revolution vs reform. Talking about
+    something quite different. There is the stereotype common people who
+    willingly uphold the power are stupid. The idea is anyone who can reason
+    would conclude the power is a purely narcissist force who only aim for
+    control. Stereotypes indeed rarely if ever hold up when put to the test and
+    this is no exception. In a quite well known book there is a character named
+    Syme. Syme is one of the people behind creating newspeak. Syme is a very
+    intelligent person and sees right through the party yet he is one of the
+    most orthodox and loyal followers of the party. He constantly talks about
+    how his work is helping the party limit the range of thought. With every
+    cell in his body he supports and actively contributes to a system that only
+    aims to control him. The party ends up vaporizing him for knowing too much
+    even though he was one of the most loyal and orthodox person around.
+  </p>
+
+  <h2>Where is the totalitarianism?</h2>
+  <p>
+    The conclusion of many more traditionalist beliefs in theory seems to be
+    totalitarianism as we know it. Traditional has a prerendered concept of
+    what society should look like and demands it conforms to that shape no
+    matter what. It demands leaders who have these views ingrained into them
+    and demands power gets exercised to enforce this image. Laws exist only
+    for the reason of upholding this image. To pass bills the only available
+    framework is arguing for how it will contribute to upholding the image. How
+    come is it that the traditionalists would bother to even make pricy jails
+    when their supporters would be perfectly happy shooting the unemployed? Go
+    ahead and search up morals. Morals has a quite bending meaning as it only
+    aims to define what is right and wrong in the context of any given
+    system. So many people who bluntly only support the demands of
+    traditionalist at the same time will preach freedoms and liberties. These
+    freedom and liberties seem to fundamentally clash with everything
+    traditionalism stands for.
+  </p>
+</article>
-- 
cgit v1.2.3