From fe72f607bd241a25897717abf2d3e4d9f6036cdc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: nathansmith117 <nathansmith117@sdf.org>
Date: Sat, 25 May 2024 13:10:31 -0600
Subject: Used the at least one required matrix refecance per small website

---
 the_philosophy_commune.html | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

(limited to 'the_philosophy_commune.html')

diff --git a/the_philosophy_commune.html b/the_philosophy_commune.html
index 7f10120..aa131cd 100644
--- a/the_philosophy_commune.html
+++ b/the_philosophy_commune.html
@@ -111,7 +111,46 @@ table {
                     <td>
                         <h2 id="abstract">The abstract</h2>
                         <p>
-                            Still to come
+                            Before getting into dialectical materialism and that stuff I will go into my own ideas
+                            which are even more abstract but a good place to build on to understand the dialectics.
+                            Just bare with me while I throw your brain into a microwave and forgot about it for a
+                            while without even knowing its burning (like the way microwave popcorn got banned at
+                            school).
+                        </p>
+                        <h3>Verbs and nouns</h3>
+                        <p>
+                            In english we rely on nouns a lot to talk about things. Everytime we use a noun
+                            we are refecancing a thing or idea so we can talk about it. We can talk about
+                            how the thing looks like x-mas barf, smells like a dogs ass (I don't want to know 
+                            how you know what a dogs ass smells like), feels like the random
+                            thing you found outside you wish you didn't touch...<br/>
+                            but what if I told you there are other ways to talk about things!<br/>
+                            <img src="https://media1.tenor.com/m/fyf4BI5DSyIAAAAC/red-pill-vista.gif" alt="_target" width="50%"/>
+                        </p>
+                        <h3>Overthinking shit</h3>
+                        <p>
+                            I shall start us with a simple math problem: x^2=1 solve for x. It has two correct answers:
+                            x=1 and x=-1. If something like this pops up in a math problem you can only use 1 or -1
+                            for the problem and it will effect the final requests of the problem though entail you
+                            solve it the problem is in a state of having two possible outcomes. Its just like Schrödinger's cat
+                            where you have a box with the dead/alive cat in it you can walk around town with your
+                            funky little dead/alive cat, go on a romantic date with your dead/alive cat, throw it into
+                            oncoming traffic to know for sure its fucking dead /hj... but entail you open the box its
+                            in a state of both but once its open you have a dead cat or a alive cat like how x^2=1
+                            is both 1 and -1 entail used.
+                            <br/><br/>
+                            Another idea to think about is numbers like pi. If you
+                            have a forumal for pi you bascially have every single digit of pi in a set of instructions
+                            but you can't use them. You have to apply the forumal first but it will go on forever
+                            if you do that so x+generate_pi() wouldn't work. Instead you would only use so many
+                            digits of pi like this x+generate_pi(16) for 16 digits. We could in place of every
+                            magic number use a generator to be able to fine tune how everything is generated and
+                            applied. To keep everything constantant we could use generators for every number and
+                            treat operators as functions and use things like lazy evaluation,
+                            strict evaluation... to direction the flow of are logic for whatever we are doing.
+                            You can read about this kind of stuff in
+                            <a href="https://mitp-content-server.mit.edu/books/content/sectbyfn/books_pres_0/6515/sicp.zip/index.html" target="_blank">
+                                Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs</a>.
                         </p>
                     </td>
                 </tr>
-- 
cgit v1.2.3