diff options
| author | nathansmith <nathansmith@posteo.com> | 2025-05-23 07:43:34 -0600 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | nathansmith <nathansmith@posteo.com> | 2025-05-23 07:43:34 -0600 |
| commit | 4e749697600bab526b1cf51bcca493f6d31d2e34 (patch) | |
| tree | 10a0274c96667d1482dd7f07d768feaf518d6187 /archive/the_philosophy_commune.html | |
| parent | d194694f31002068868a378d121ed0e2db01c378 (diff) | |
Almost done with this stupidness
Diffstat (limited to 'archive/the_philosophy_commune.html')
| -rw-r--r-- | archive/the_philosophy_commune.html | 296 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 296 deletions
diff --git a/archive/the_philosophy_commune.html b/archive/the_philosophy_commune.html deleted file mode 100644 index 7013e17..0000000 --- a/archive/the_philosophy_commune.html +++ /dev/null @@ -1,296 +0,0 @@ -<!DOCTYPE html> -<html> - -<head> - <title>The philosophy commune</title> - -<style> - -body { - color: black; - background-image: url('images/philosophy_commune_background.jpg'); -} - -table { - color: black; - background-color: #bebebe; - margin-top: 10px; - margin-bottom: 10px; - margin-left: 10px; - margin-right: 10px; -} - -#warning { - color: red; -} - -</style> - -</head> - -<body> - <a href="../index.html"><img src="../images/back_home.png" alt="Back to home page"/></a> - - <center> - <h1>The philosophy commune</h1> - - <table border="1" width="60%"> - <tr> - <td> - <p id="warning"> - Warning: This part of the website is mostly my inner nonsense released into the world and - it likely doesn't make any sense. I plan on completely remaking it sometime. - </p> - <h2>Yes, I am a evil commie.</h2> - <p> - In this very "well" designed web page I will layout the basics of what socialism and communism really is - (not the stuff that the bourgeoisie have lead everyone to believe) and what it means to be a commie. - <br/><br/> - While I don't know as much on this topic as a lot of other commies I can at least give you a start. - I will focus more on the philosophy behind it all before even touching everything else. - <br/><br/> - Sections: - </p> - - <ul> - <li><a href="#start">the start</a></li> - <li><a href="#abstract">the abstract</a></li> - <li><a href="#dialectics">the dialectics</a></li> - <li><a href="#applied">the applied</a></li> - </ul> - </td> - </tr> - </table> - - <table border="1" width="60%"> - <tr> - <td> - <h2 id="start">The start</h2> - <p> - This place is called the philosophy commune because Its more focused on the philosophy and - how it interacts with communism then it is with the politics. Its a common misunderstanding - that marxism is some crazy cult like political ideology (some marxist groups are tbh) though - if you read any real writing of Karl Marx or Friedrich Engels you will find mostly philosophy - and it being applied in more abstract ways instead of the lies we have been given. To understand - topics like economics and politics its important to first understand philosophy as the base for - everything else. Start out at any wikipedia page and continue clicking the first link - and you will either reach the philosophy wiki page or get stuck in a endless loop. - <br/><br/> - - Every complete ideology has a base made up of more abstract philosophy. For example classical and neo - liberalism has many layers like right of the individual and private property rights and the way - liberalism treats it is more or less connected to christian ideas like the idea that some people - are closer to god then others so under liberalism right of the individual is more then just freedom - but the idea that some people are narcissisticly above others and that government limiting there - power over other people is going against nature or "gods will" in a sense. Because of this - liberalism allows for people to do nothing but limit rights and freedom, call it rights and - freedom, then get away from it. "Oh no, a new law proteching users from having google - forcefully installing a microship in peoples heads is going to hurt googles holy rights - and god given status over the people. This is anti-american to give people that choice - to not have google install microchips in there head". As you can see there are many layers to - liberalism like the often misunderstood morals and bits of christian ideas and much more - I will not get into now and BTW when I target liberalism I am also targetting conservatism - because conservatism is still a form of liberalism. - <br/><br/> - - Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels created a philosophy called dialectical materialism and - used it for historical materialism which is how they understood history and they used - this to understand how society changes in mainly western countries (Russia wasn't really - included in this so they had to work off of dialectical materialism and build up there - own home cooked appied ideas for there revolution). With there philosophy marx and - engels analyzed there current capitalist society and understanding of how - the bourgeoisie (capital owning class) and proletariat (working class) interact - with each other and found the exploitation between the two and how it upholds - capitalism. Marx and Engels believe that like how the bourgeoisie lead a - revolution to gain freedom from the kings and lords of the past the - proletariat leading there own revolution for freedom from the bourgeoisie - is needed for society to progress. The philosophy behind liberalism should - make more sense now knowing that liberalism is the ideology of the - bourgeoisie class. - </p> - </td> - </tr> - </table> - - <table border="1" width="60%"> - <tr> - <td> - <h2 id="abstract">The abstract</h2> - <p> - Before getting into dialectical materialism and that stuff I will go into my own ideas - which are even more abstract but a good place to build on to understand the dialectics. - Just bare with me while I throw your brain into a microwave and forgot about it for a - while without even knowing its burning (like the way microwave popcorn got banned at - school). - </p> - <h3>Verbs and nouns</h3> - <p> - In english we rely on nouns a lot to talk about things. Everytime we use a noun - we are refecancing a thing or idea so we can talk about it. We can talk about - how the thing looks like x-mas barf, smells like a dogs ass (I don't want to know - how you know what a dogs ass smells like), feels like the random - thing you found outside you wish you didn't touch...<br/> - but what if I told you there are other ways to talk about things!<br/> - <img src="images/red_pill.gif" alt="_target" width="50%"/> - <br/> - A language where everything is called out by the action of it existing could exist. - While the grammer of english is yelling a big "fuck you!" (like with everything I write) - something like instead of "its a cat" "it be a cat" could exist and be normalized in the grammer - and have the words planned out for it to make sense in its context. Also languages can have no verbs - sense nouns also cover ideas so instead of the action of running it would be the idea of running. - Take a look at <a href="https://mw.lojban.org/papri/Are_verbs,_nouns_and_adjectives_real%3F" target="_blank"> - how lojban handles this shit</a> for some mind opening ideas. - </p> - <h3>Overthinking shit</h3> - <p> - I shall start us with a simple math problem: x^2=1 solve for x. It has two correct answers: - x=1 and x=-1. If something like this pops up in a math problem you can only use 1 or -1 - for the problem and it will effect the final requests of the problem though entail you - solve it the problem is in a state of having two possible outcomes. Its just like Schrödinger's cat - where you have a box with the dead/alive cat in it you can walk around town with your - funky little dead/alive cat, go on a romantic date with your dead/alive cat, throw it into - oncoming traffic to know for sure its fucking dead /hj... but entail you open the box its - in a state of both but once its open you have a dead cat or a alive cat like how x^2=1 - is both 1 and -1 entail used. - <br/><br/> - Another idea to think about is numbers like pi. If you - have a forumal for pi you bascially have every single digit of pi in a set of instructions - but you can't use them. You have to apply the forumal first but it will go on forever - if you do that so x+generate_pi() wouldn't work. Instead you would only use so many - digits of pi like this x+generate_pi(16) for 16 digits. We could in place of every - magic number use a generator to be able to fine tune how everything is generated and - applied. To keep everything constantant we could use generators for every number and - treat operators as functions and use things like lazy evaluation, - strict evaluation... to direction the flow of are logic for whatever we are doing. - You can read about this kind of stuff in - <a href="https://mitp-content-server.mit.edu/books/content/sectbyfn/books_pres_0/6515/sicp.zip/index.html" target="_blank"> - Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs</a>. - <br/><br/> - To continue with my madness - we could compare this to the verb and noun thing and say that functions are like verbs - and numbers are like nouns. yet we refecance the function as a noun and its made up of - instructions which are things but those things are verbs because they define the actions - of doing things then we can grab that logic of it being a refrecance to the thing then - go through the same steps on the instructions... what doth life?! - <br/><br/> - Back to x^2=1 there are things I call logic gabs. Are society pushes a very linear and isolated - "if this and that then that and this" kind of logic. Peoples minds get fried when shown things - like x^2=1 kind of like a computer going mad when asked "what doth life?!". While more standard - thinking is more newton cradle like with "this causes that" we live in a world that is closer - to a bunch of marbles of different sizes thrown into a box then shaked around and thrown everywhere. - Talking about what causes what is too much for are tiny stupido minds to understand with all those - marbles getting thrown around so instead we can think about the relationship between the marbles - and how they interact with each other. We could look at the way the big and small marbles react - when they hit each other and how it effects the movement of the marbles in the box. There is no - supreme lord marble or any of that shit. Just a bunch of marbles getting fucked up when I - decide to throw the box into oncoming traffic. - </p> - </td> - </tr> - </table> - - <table border="1" width="60%"> - <tr> - <td> - <h2 id="dialectics">The dialectics</h2> - <p> - I am not going to go much into dialectics because - A: The abstract shit I went into has the infomation you need to know to understand dialectics. - B: You can watch a fucking youtube video you fucker. To sum things up with dialectics we - describe the relationship between different things to understand them. - <br/><br/> - To understand Marx's dialectics we need to understand idealism vs materialism. Karl Marx - read lots of Hegel (the old dude no one understands) and Hegel was very idealist and his - idealism is all about the mind and spirit and how they shape reality. Idealists believe - that everything around us is shaped by are own mind. "If a tree falls and no one is - around to hear it does it make a sound?" is a common question used to bring forward - idealist ideas because it shows that senory feelings exist in the mind and not in - the world around us and that every single thing we see and feel is in are mind and - not the world around us. Materialism is about the world around us and believes - that matter is the base of reality. Vulgar materialism as blunty as possible - states that everything is just matter and a common example of vulgar materialism - is kicking a stone to prove its existance. Karl Marx is a materialist but not - a vulgar materialist. For understanding things vulgar materialism really - isn't that helpful. - <br/><br/> - Karl Marx's dialectical materialism is often thought of a materialist version - of Hegel's dialectics though I like to think of it as more of a dialectic - between idealism and materialism being applied on other things as a way to understand the - world. Karl Marx applied his dialectical materialism to history to create historical materialism. - Its a view of history where instead of being centered around the actions of one great - leader or key events like some big ass battle its more about different ideas floating around, - ideas things and people interacting with each other, changes in conditions in the world... - Karl Marx believes that people are shaped by there envirtment and not just destined to be - something. A rich man is rich because he was born into a rich family, was in the right place - at the right time... and not because he "had that rich chad alpha mindset and pulled himself - up by the bootstraps". Karl Marx isn't discrediting anyones work put - into something but more of saying that the conditions someone is in is important to how - they grow as a person and how there effort interacts with the world. - <br/><br/> - A good example is trumps "small loan" of a million dollars. He brags about building up his company - from a loan of a million dollars to make it sound like he was a average guy who - built up a empire from hardwork and mindset alone when really being able to - grow up seeing how his dad handles real estate and getting to met other people - in that business and having his family name as a symbol is priceless and really - impacts the future of someone. Somone growing up in a average household isn't - going to get to learn all the insider secrets of real estate at a young age - in a time without internet then grow up to be given a loan of money bigger then - any amount any normal person will ever touch to apply there knowledge to conitnue - spreading the family empire. - <br/><br/> - A did a TERRIBLE job with Marx's dialectics so please read Marx's shit instead of taking - my word on anything. I am a tired lazy fuck that isn't to be trusted about anything. - </p> - </td> - </tr> - </table> - - <table border="1" width="60%"> - <tr> - <td> - <h2 id="applied">The applied</h2> - <p> - Just like how I talked about that a function that generates pi exists in a abstract form - and has all the digits of pi entail applied I think of marxism the same way. There is - the more abstract parts of marxism like dialectical materialism and historical materialsm - then there is the applied marxism like the science of revolution and all the stuff - about the bourgeoisie exploiting the proletariat. - <br/><br/> - When people say that marxism is - a science they don't mean the science you learned in school but instead they mean - wissenschaft which is more about learning, studying, and understanding the world instead - of just the search for truth like how we know it today. Wissenschaft is more broad - and includes things like art and religion as long as its the search for knowledge. - Also in marxism the term socialism is used more broadly. Because of decades of the - red scare its meaning have been completely fucked up. Karl marx often used socialism - to describe the idea of things along the line of any form of social ownership of - the means of production, modern society planned around a need or idea... He - would describe people we would now know as conservatism as something like - "petty-bourgeois socialism" meaning socialism made for the petty-bourgeois - (small business owners). - <br/><br/> - Communism means stateless, classless, moneyless society - and to be a communist doesn't mean you are setting that as your up front idea - of what needs to be done now but instead supporting a form of socialism that - brings us closer to that. As a communist I believe in the bourgeoisie class - coming to an end and the means of production being controlled by the proletariat. - The government we know is nearly just part of bourgeoisie society. The government - is ran by and actively supports the bourgeoisie. It sets laws that gives - companies copy rights that make sure even just there ideas can't be touched - by the proletariat or petty-bourgeoisie that are a risk to the big companies. - One isse with liberalism is it sees big companies and government as isolated entities. - With that mindset they will often support government thinking its keeping them safe - from the bourgeoisie or support the bourgeoisie keeping them safe from the government. - <br/><br/> - I completely fucked this up so PLEASE read good shit like - <a href="https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1880/soc-utop/index.htm" target="_blank"> - Socialism: Utopian and Scientific - </a>. - </p> - </td> - </tr> - </table> - - </center> -</body> -</html> |