aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/org/blog/articles
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authornathan <nathansmith@disroot.org>2025-08-21 03:38:03 -0600
committernathan <nathansmith@disroot.org>2025-08-21 03:38:03 -0600
commitdecd96e3e848a85080fb41cd33bec5136aad5b90 (patch)
tree2a8a1935c32b0010a38792fa1c5d515d3e028486 /org/blog/articles
parent0493a975177d9aff8d8763352ae980c2670bf37d (diff)
downloadshittyweb-decd96e3e848a85080fb41cd33bec5136aad5b90.tar.gz
shittyweb-decd96e3e848a85080fb41cd33bec5136aad5b90.tar.bz2
shittyweb-decd96e3e848a85080fb41cd33bec5136aad5b90.zip
The death of countercultureHEADmain
Diffstat (limited to 'org/blog/articles')
-rw-r--r--org/blog/articles/the-death-of-counterculture.xml210
1 files changed, 210 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/org/blog/articles/the-death-of-counterculture.xml b/org/blog/articles/the-death-of-counterculture.xml
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..852c7a1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/org/blog/articles/the-death-of-counterculture.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,210 @@
+<article>
+ <p>
+ Now days inclusiveness, diversity, lgbtq+... are all associated to
+ corporations, governments, and all those nasty power structures. How did
+ this happen?! Those things should be against the system, power, and
+ control. Why are powerful people and power structures using these things
+ for their own use? Why are the same people claiming to be against the power
+ rejecting certain subgroups of the working class? Shouldn't it be the
+ working class against the ruling?! To answer these questions here is a
+ <b>very rough</b> overview of progressive history.
+ </p>
+
+ <h2>Enlightenment</h2>
+ <p>
+ Quite a ways back in europe thinkers started to come together and ask
+ questions and search for answers. They looked back at philosophy from way
+ before their own time and started coming up with new ways of thinking
+ themselves. This was a world controlled by kings and churches and the new
+ ways of thinking brought their power into question. Instead of blind faith
+ people started to use logic and reason. Science, art, and technology took
+ off. Growing distaste for the old ways and conditions for a new way brought
+ about revolution in many places some notable ones being the french
+ revolution and the american revolution.
+
+ Its a common misunderstanding that the french revolution was the poor
+ against the rich. What really happened was there was a growing middle class
+ known as the bourgeoisie. They were once small in numbers and power but
+ were quickly becoming a economic and intellectual force ready to take on
+ the world. The growing dislike towards the kings and aristocrats, a new up
+ and coming class, and poor people in need of better conditions lead to the
+ bourgeoisie uprising. After generations of bourgeoisie in power they ended
+ up replacing the kings and aristocrats they destroyed. People who once
+ talked about logic and reason, freedom and liberty... are now the ones
+ aiming to keep working class people others dumb and compliant. Even though
+ democracy and liberty wise we are back on square one all this didnt happen
+ in vain. New technology and ideas have been brought into the world that can
+ bring about things far greater than what the enlightenment age thinkers
+ could ever imagine. Its just a manner and leveraging new conditions in the
+ favor of freedom and liberty.
+ </p>
+
+ <h2>Post enlightenment</h2>
+ <p>
+ The enlightenment thinkers nearly set the framework for history following
+ that time. A lot has happened since than. Some notable thinkers after them
+ are Darwin, Hegel, and Marx. Darwin changed the way we understand
+ species and biology. Hegel improved the way we understand the mind, the
+ world, and the way everything you observe interacts. Marx applied those
+ concepts among others to understand the problems of post enlightenment
+ society and created a framework for understand historical change. Since the
+ cycle of new ways, new rulers, and new ideas improving things only to take
+ hold and turn to shit been observed the question now is how do we break
+ free of that cycle? If society evolves and changes in the same manner that
+ biology does than the hope is society will one day evolve to fulfill
+ material needs, freedom, and liberty. How do we ensure this future?
+ </p>
+
+ <h2>The progressive movement</h2>
+ <p>
+ A growing dislike of the bourgeoisie, and these new ideas lead to a new
+ movement. Workers unionized and went on strike, laws against child labor
+ got made, company towns got taken down, food regulations got put in place
+ to stop food companies from poisoning everyone. One of the greatest (least
+ shitty) american presidents of all time, Theodore Roosevelt himself helped
+ the movement with his admirable amount of stubbornness. The game monopoly
+ was created by a anti-landlord activist and follower of Henry
+ George. Around the world the seeds for socialism, communism, and anarchy
+ were being planted.
+ </p>
+
+ <p>
+ "Thinking is the best way to travel" - The Moody Blues.
+ </p>
+
+ <h2>Authoritarianism</h2>
+ <p>
+ Many were feeling that people aren't smart enough for democracy. They felt
+ that <i>free-market</i> and worker controlled means of production are just
+ two sides of the same coin. They wanted to go back to the world of kings,
+ mono-cultures, and state churches. They saw the working class as a bunch of
+ dumb chaotic people who need someone bigger and smarter to think for
+ them. Many looked at darwnism and thought that maybe the same can be said
+ for rulers. That the strongest best leader takes control and its their duty
+ and right to rule. They also looked at the masses and thought about
+ selective breeding them to be more compliant like farm animals. The
+ enlightenment thinkers left a hole. Their ideas of free will and logic
+ didn't include everyone. Under their framework you can quite easily say not
+ everyone can think with free will and logic and those who don't should be
+ lead and controlled by those who do.
+ </p>
+
+ <h2>War</h2>
+ <p>
+ Around the around those authoritarian and progressive ideas didn't
+ always clash. Sometimes they merged. People were growing distrustful of new
+ ways because of economic and social issues but were still tired of the
+ old. New fears gave people with answers power and control. Fascism and
+ nazism started spreading. In russia the communist movements to played into
+ it. They decide instead of breaking the pattern of control to leverage the
+ pattern of control. Freedom and liberty were no longer seen as
+ important. The nazis and new age communists (they weren't much like the
+ originals) fucking hated each other for this. Each one demanded a level of
+ control that multiple empires can't all have. <b>The driving force behind
+ fighting nazis wasn't a moral one but a practical one</b>. After everything
+ was over the same people fighting nazis shared similar ideas. America used
+ the war to gain alliances with other nations and grow to a economic and
+ military power even though it didn't do much of the fighting. A lot of
+ americas felt like they fought the wrong enemy though admitting that is
+ dangerous after all the nazis committed so many unmoral actions. American
+ ideas, nazi ideas, and a wall of lies lead way to neoliberalism.
+ </p>
+
+ <h2>Neoliberalism</h2>
+ <p>
+ All the american solders who fought a war that wasn't theirs returned home
+ as the good guys but with the ideology of the bad guys. The most powerful
+ of both worlds. Why just beat the nazis when we can replace them is what
+ they ask. Nationalism, christianity, eugenics, racism, sexism,
+ ablism... were all given a place to grow. German scientists who created
+ nazi weapons were brought to america to finish were the nazis left off. The
+ new enemies were the communists. In russia they were also leveraging post
+ war conditions. The weapons became so advanced that now any powerful nation
+ can destroy the entire earth with a press of a button. In the past if a
+ nation had a super powerful weapon they would use it gladly. Now that a
+ weapon that can destroy the whole planet existed and all sides had them
+ war leaders had to reframe from using their most deadly weapon. This gave
+ birth to the cold war. Meanwhile in america there was a rising middle class
+ and countries being rebuilt under american investments would soon
+ follow. This middle class being made up of that ex-solders.
+ </p>
+
+ <h2>Counterculture</h2>
+ <p>
+ The middle class of ex-solders had a hell ton of children. These children
+ were born and grew up in the most calm time period in a long time yet the
+ pattern of control was more clear than ever to anyone watching from the
+ side lines. The world they grew up in was completely different than the one
+ past generations knew. New ideas and technology radicalized pulled the
+ entire world into a new age. As they grew up they slowly learned they lived
+ in a world built on lies but they couldn't quite put their finger on
+ it. Pointless war and pointless violence everywhere. Easier access to
+ psychedelics interacted with a growing awareness of the pattern of
+ control. Better education served as a double sided sword for the new
+ control. It needed smart people to operate the new complex technological
+ world yet education can lead to new enlightenment and breaking free of the
+ rulers of the world. The young started creating their own culture. One of
+ new music, new ways to get wasted... The old get drunk in bars while the
+ young got high at rock concerts. They concluded the issues with the world
+ to be a cultural one. The powers of the world spread a culture of control
+ and violence. Instead we need a culture of peace and love. The civil rights
+ movement, women's rights movements, gay rights movements all hit center
+ stage. Every action the leaders did to counteract the new movement only
+ verified what the hippies already knew.
+ </p>
+
+ <h2>The death of counterculture</h2>
+ <p>
+ The hole with counterculture is it saw things through a more cultural lens
+ and lacked more economic and historical ones that other progressive
+ movements had. It was a grass roots movement that as a whole lacked much of
+ the deep philosophy progressive thinkers been coming up with and improving
+ upon since the beginning of written history. Counterculture was simply glue
+ of peace and love holding together a bunch of hippies and
+ activists. Counterculture was still deeply capitalist since it was only a
+ cultural revolution that it pushed for. Wood stock was all profits and
+ business under the hood. All the counterculture artists spreading peace and
+ love were feeding back into the capitalist system. All the hippies were
+ plucked from the fields and put in the corporate offices. The system can't
+ defeat them so it joined them and profited off it. The businesses and
+ governments were painted colorful yet its still the same walls
+ underneath. Steve jobs was a hippie tripping on LSD on a farm before he
+ started apple. The military now <i>spreads democracy</i> instead of take
+ over countries. Yes, this is very america centered but everything an empire
+ does spreads. Counterculture crossed the sea back and forward many
+ times. With the hippies in control of the world its now seen as good to be
+ a little progressive but pushing for ideas progressive enough to actually
+ do anything is labeled extremest. A company only has to be moral enough to
+ not be boycotted. Slavery was out sourced far away. Out of sight out of
+ mind. Making the pattern of control less painful is encouraged but breaking
+ the pattern is fought against just as much.
+ </p>
+
+ <h2>The reactionaries</h2>
+ <p>
+ A system dominated by strong white men was being replaced. Women, black
+ people, gays... were making their way into the governments and
+ corporations. This was seen as a threat so many doubled down on the
+ post-war version of the status quo. They saw new capitalism as weak and
+ blamed all their issues on it. Nostalgia as we know it was born. "Things
+ were better before <i>insert anything here</i>". "If the hippies like peace
+ and love than lets spread hate and violence". The reactionaries never think
+ deeper than that. They only think about what is instead of what can
+ be. They concluded that if the present sucks than we should go back to the
+ past. They fail to envision a better future. That's the whole point behind
+ "make america great again". How they see it is the pattern of control was
+ in their favor but now its out of their favor. Removing the pattern of
+ control is out of the question.
+ </p>
+
+ <h2>To finish things up</h2>
+ <p>
+ Make sure to spend time going outside, learning new skills, reading cool
+ books, and listening to good music. Don't fall for the traps the system has
+ set. Things will not improve much until we break this pattern. I call for a
+ new type of revolution. This blog post was partly inspired by
+ <a href="https://youtube.com/watch?v=nST5BggdfUs" target="_blank">
+ this video
+ </a>. Do check it out (: Love you all stay safe and keep your eyes open :D
+ </p>
+</article>