aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/archive
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'archive')
-rw-r--r--archive/images/philosophy_commune_background.jpgbin0 -> 31915 bytes
-rw-r--r--archive/the_philosophy_commune.html300
2 files changed, 300 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/archive/images/philosophy_commune_background.jpg b/archive/images/philosophy_commune_background.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..b535609
--- /dev/null
+++ b/archive/images/philosophy_commune_background.jpg
Binary files differ
diff --git a/archive/the_philosophy_commune.html b/archive/the_philosophy_commune.html
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..482fc4b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/archive/the_philosophy_commune.html
@@ -0,0 +1,300 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html>
+<html>
+
+<head>
+ <title>The philosophy commune</title>
+
+<style>
+
+body {
+ color: black;
+ background-image: url('images/philosophy_commune_background.jpg');
+}
+
+table {
+ color: black;
+ background-color: #bebebe;
+ margin-top: 10px;
+ margin-bottom: 10px;
+ margin-left: 10px;
+ margin-right: 10px;
+}
+
+#warning {
+ color: red;
+}
+
+</style>
+
+</head>
+
+<body>
+ <center>
+ <h1>The philosophy commune</h1>
+
+ <table border="1" width="60%">
+ <tr>
+ <td>
+ <p id="warning">
+ Warning: This part of the website is mostly my inner nonsense released into the world and
+ it likely doesn't make any sense. I plan on completely remaking it sometime.
+ </p>
+ <h2>Yes, I am a evil commie.</h2>
+ <p>
+ In this very "well" designed web page I will layout the basics of what socialism and communism really is
+ (not the stuff that the bourgeoisie have lead everyone to believe) and what it means to be a commie.
+ <br/><br/>
+ While I don't know as much on this topic as a lot of other commies I can at least give you a start.
+ I will focus more on the philosophy behind it all before even touching everything else.
+ <br/><br/>
+ Sections:
+ </p>
+
+ <ul>
+ <li><a href="#start">the start</a></li>
+ <li><a href="#abstract">the abstract</a></li>
+ <li><a href="#dialectics">the dialectics</a></li>
+ <li><a href="#applied">the applied</a></li>
+ </ul>
+ </td>
+ </tr>
+
+ <tr>
+ <td>
+ <h2><a href="../index.html">--&gt; Back to main page</a></h2>
+ </td>
+ </tr>
+ </table>
+
+ <table border="1" width="60%">
+ <tr>
+ <td>
+ <h2 id="start">The start</h2>
+ <p>
+ This place is called the philosophy commune because Its more focused on the philosophy and
+ how it interacts with communism then it is with the politics. Its a common misunderstanding
+ that marxism is some crazy cult like political ideology (some marxist groups are tbh) though
+ if you read any real writing of Karl Marx or Friedrich Engels you will find mostly philosophy
+ and it being applied in more abstract ways instead of the lies we have been given. To understand
+ topics like economics and politics its important to first understand philosophy as the base for
+ everything else. Start out at any wikipedia page and continue clicking the first link
+ and you will either reach the philosophy wiki page or get stuck in a endless loop.
+ <br/><br/>
+
+ Every complete ideology has a base made up of more abstract philosophy. For example classical and neo
+ liberalism has many layers like right of the individual and private property rights and the way
+ liberalism treats it is more or less connected to christian ideas like the idea that some people
+ are closer to god then others so under liberalism right of the individual is more then just freedom
+ but the idea that some people are narcissisticly above others and that government limiting there
+ power over other people is going against nature or "gods will" in a sense. Because of this
+ liberalism allows for people to do nothing but limit rights and freedom, call it rights and
+ freedom, then get away from it. "Oh no, a new law proteching users from having google
+ forcefully installing a microship in peoples heads is going to hurt googles holy rights
+ and god given status over the people. This is anti-american to give people that choice
+ to not have google install microchips in there head". As you can see there are many layers to
+ liberalism like the often misunderstood morals and bits of christian ideas and much more
+ I will not get into now and BTW when I target liberalism I am also targetting conservatism
+ because conservatism is still a form of liberalism.
+ <br/><br/>
+
+ Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels created a philosophy called dialectical materialism and
+ used it for historical materialism which is how they understood history and they used
+ this to understand how society changes in mainly western countries (Russia wasn't really
+ included in this so they had to work off of dialectical materialism and build up there
+ own home cooked appied ideas for there revolution). With there philosophy marx and
+ engels analyzed there current capitalist society and understanding of how
+ the bourgeoisie (capital owning class) and proletariat (working class) interact
+ with each other and found the exploitation between the two and how it upholds
+ capitalism. Marx and Engels believe that like how the bourgeoisie lead a
+ revolution to gain freedom from the kings and lords of the past the
+ proletariat leading there own revolution for freedom from the bourgeoisie
+ is needed for society to progress. The philosophy behind liberalism should
+ make more sense now knowing that liberalism is the ideology of the
+ bourgeoisie class.
+ </p>
+ </td>
+ </tr>
+ </table>
+
+ <table border="1" width="60%">
+ <tr>
+ <td>
+ <h2 id="abstract">The abstract</h2>
+ <p>
+ Before getting into dialectical materialism and that stuff I will go into my own ideas
+ which are even more abstract but a good place to build on to understand the dialectics.
+ Just bare with me while I throw your brain into a microwave and forgot about it for a
+ while without even knowing its burning (like the way microwave popcorn got banned at
+ school).
+ </p>
+ <h3>Verbs and nouns</h3>
+ <p>
+ In english we rely on nouns a lot to talk about things. Everytime we use a noun
+ we are refecancing a thing or idea so we can talk about it. We can talk about
+ how the thing looks like x-mas barf, smells like a dogs ass (I don't want to know
+ how you know what a dogs ass smells like), feels like the random
+ thing you found outside you wish you didn't touch...<br/>
+ but what if I told you there are other ways to talk about things!<br/>
+ <img src="https://media1.tenor.com/m/fyf4BI5DSyIAAAAC/red-pill-vista.gif" alt="_target" width="50%"/>
+ <br/>
+ A language where everything is called out by the action of it existing could exist.
+ While the grammer of english is yelling a big "fuck you!" (like with everything I write)
+ something like instead of "its a cat" "it be a cat" could exist and be normalized in the grammer
+ and have the words planned out for it to make sense in its context. Also languages can have no verbs
+ sense nouns also cover ideas so instead of the action of running it would be the idea of running.
+ Take a look at <a href="https://mw.lojban.org/papri/Are_verbs,_nouns_and_adjectives_real%3F" target="_blank">
+ how lojban handles this shit</a> for some mind opening ideas.
+ </p>
+ <h3>Overthinking shit</h3>
+ <p>
+ I shall start us with a simple math problem: x^2=1 solve for x. It has two correct answers:
+ x=1 and x=-1. If something like this pops up in a math problem you can only use 1 or -1
+ for the problem and it will effect the final requests of the problem though entail you
+ solve it the problem is in a state of having two possible outcomes. Its just like Schrödinger's cat
+ where you have a box with the dead/alive cat in it you can walk around town with your
+ funky little dead/alive cat, go on a romantic date with your dead/alive cat, throw it into
+ oncoming traffic to know for sure its fucking dead /hj... but entail you open the box its
+ in a state of both but once its open you have a dead cat or a alive cat like how x^2=1
+ is both 1 and -1 entail used.
+ <br/><br/>
+ Another idea to think about is numbers like pi. If you
+ have a forumal for pi you bascially have every single digit of pi in a set of instructions
+ but you can't use them. You have to apply the forumal first but it will go on forever
+ if you do that so x+generate_pi() wouldn't work. Instead you would only use so many
+ digits of pi like this x+generate_pi(16) for 16 digits. We could in place of every
+ magic number use a generator to be able to fine tune how everything is generated and
+ applied. To keep everything constantant we could use generators for every number and
+ treat operators as functions and use things like lazy evaluation,
+ strict evaluation... to direction the flow of are logic for whatever we are doing.
+ You can read about this kind of stuff in
+ <a href="https://mitp-content-server.mit.edu/books/content/sectbyfn/books_pres_0/6515/sicp.zip/index.html" target="_blank">
+ Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs</a>.
+ <br/><br/>
+ To continue with my madness
+ we could compare this to the verb and noun thing and say that functions are like verbs
+ and numbers are like nouns. yet we refecance the function as a noun and its made up of
+ instructions which are things but those things are verbs because they define the actions
+ of doing things then we can grab that logic of it being a refrecance to the thing then
+ go through the same steps on the instructions... what doth life?!
+ <br/><br/>
+ Back to x^2=1 there are things I call logic gabs. Are society pushes a very linear and isolated
+ "if this and that then that and this" kind of logic. Peoples minds get fried when shown things
+ like x^2=1 kind of like a computer going mad when asked "what doth life?!". While more standard
+ thinking is more newton cradle like with "this causes that" we live in a world that is closer
+ to a bunch of marbles of different sizes thrown into a box then shaked around and thrown everywhere.
+ Talking about what causes what is too much for are tiny stupido minds to understand with all those
+ marbles getting thrown around so instead we can think about the relationship between the marbles
+ and how they interact with each other. We could look at the way the big and small marbles react
+ when they hit each other and how it effects the movement of the marbles in the box. There is no
+ supreme lord marble or any of that shit. Just a bunch of marbles getting fucked up when I
+ decide to throw the box into oncoming traffic.
+ </p>
+ </td>
+ </tr>
+ </table>
+
+ <table border="1" width="60%">
+ <tr>
+ <td>
+ <h2 id="dialectics">The dialectics</h2>
+ <p>
+ I am not going to go much into dialectics because
+ A: The abstract shit I went into has the infomation you need to know to understand dialectics.
+ B: You can watch a fucking youtube video you fucker. To sum things up with dialectics we
+ describe the relationship between different things to understand them.
+ <br/><br/>
+ To understand Marx's dialectics we need to understand idealism vs materialism. Karl Marx
+ read lots of Hegel (the old dude no one understands) and Hegel was very idealist and his
+ idealism is all about the mind and spirit and how they shape reality. Idealists believe
+ that everything around us is shaped by are own mind. "If a tree falls and no one is
+ around to hear it does it make a sound?" is a common question used to bring forward
+ idealist ideas because it shows that senory feelings exist in the mind and not in
+ the world around us and that every single thing we see and feel is in are mind and
+ not the world around us. Materialism is about the world around us and believes
+ that matter is the base of reality. Vulgar materialism as blunty as possible
+ states that everything is just matter and a common example of vulgar materialism
+ is kicking a stone to prove its existance. Karl Marx is a materialist but not
+ a vulgar materialist. For understanding things vulgar materialism really
+ isn't that helpful.
+ <br/><br/>
+ Karl Marx's dialectical materialism is often thought of a materialist version
+ of Hegel's dialectics though I like to think of it as more of a dialectic
+ between idealism and materialism being applied on other things as a way to understand the
+ world. Karl Marx applied his dialectical materialism to history to create historical materialism.
+ Its a view of history where instead of being centered around the actions of one great
+ leader or key events like some big ass battle its more about different ideas floating around,
+ ideas things and people interacting with each other, changes in conditions in the world...
+ Karl Marx believes that people are shaped by there envirtment and not just destined to be
+ something. A rich man is rich because he was born into a rich family, was in the right place
+ at the right time... and not because he "had that rich chad alpha mindset and pulled himself
+ up by the bootstraps". Karl Marx isn't discrediting anyones work put
+ into something but more of saying that the conditions someone is in is important to how
+ they grow as a person and how there effort interacts with the world.
+ <br/><br/>
+ A good example is trumps "small loan" of a million dollars. He brags about building up his company
+ from a loan of a million dollars to make it sound like he was a average guy who
+ built up a empire from hardwork and mindset alone when really being able to
+ grow up seeing how his dad handles real estate and getting to met other people
+ in that business and having his family name as a symbol is priceless and really
+ impacts the future of someone. Somone growing up in a average household isn't
+ going to get to learn all the insider secrets of real estate at a young age
+ in a time without internet then grow up to be given a loan of money bigger then
+ any amount any normal person will ever touch to apply there knowledge to conitnue
+ spreading the family empire.
+ <br/><br/>
+ A did a TERRIBLE job with Marx's dialectics so please read Marx's shit instead of taking
+ my word on anything. I am a tired lazy fuck that isn't to be trusted about anything.
+ </p>
+ </td>
+ </tr>
+ </table>
+
+ <table border="1" width="60%">
+ <tr>
+ <td>
+ <h2 id="applied">The applied</h2>
+ <p>
+ Just like how I talked about that a function that generates pi exists in a abstract form
+ and has all the digits of pi entail applied I think of marxism the same way. There is
+ the more abstract parts of marxism like dialectical materialism and historical materialsm
+ then there is the applied marxism like the science of revolution and all the stuff
+ about the bourgeoisie exploiting the proletariat.
+ <br/><br/>
+ When people say that marxism is
+ a science they don't mean the science you learned in school but instead they mean
+ wissenschaft which is more about learning, studying, and understanding the world instead
+ of just the search for truth like how we know it today. Wissenschaft is more broad
+ and includes things like art and religion as long as its the search for knowledge.
+ Also in marxism the term socialism is used more broadly. Because of decades of the
+ red scare its meaning have been completely fucked up. Karl marx often used socialism
+ to describe the idea of things along the line of any form of social ownership of
+ the means of production, modern society planned around a need or idea... He
+ would describe people we would now know as conservatism as something like
+ "petty-bourgeois socialism" meaning socialism made for the petty-bourgeois
+ (small business owners).
+ <br/><br/>
+ Communism means stateless, classless, moneyless society
+ and to be a communist doesn't mean you are setting that as your up front idea
+ of what needs to be done now but instead supporting a form of socialism that
+ brings us closer to that. As a communist I believe in the bourgeoisie class
+ coming to an end and the means of production being controlled by the proletariat.
+ The government we know is nearly just part of bourgeoisie society. The government
+ is ran by and actively supports the bourgeoisie. It sets laws that gives
+ companies copy rights that make sure even just there ideas can't be touched
+ by the proletariat or petty-bourgeoisie that are a risk to the big companies.
+ One isse with liberalism is it sees big companies and government as isolated entities.
+ With that mindset they will often support government thinking its keeping them safe
+ from the bourgeoisie or support the bourgeoisie keeping them safe from the government.
+ <br/><br/>
+ I completely fucked this up so PLEASE read good shit like
+ <a href="https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1880/soc-utop/index.htm" target="_blank">
+ Socialism: Utopian and Scientific
+ </a>.
+ </p>
+ </td>
+ </tr>
+ </table>
+
+ </center>
+</body>
+</html>