2 files changed, 134 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/org/blog/articles/in-defence-of-bad-spelling.txt b/org/blog/articles/in-defence-of-bad-spelling.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..065b9af
--- /dev/null
+++ b/org/blog/articles/in-defence-of-bad-spelling.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
+All the fucking time on reddit anything anyone says gets rendered at best an
+invalid argument and at worse complete nonsense that the mindless redditor
+cant decode all because a slight spelling error or some stuppa shit like using
+_to_ instead of _too_. In school they punish everyone for even things that
+arent spelling errors. Used ' in the wrong context? You failed. All you
+brashwased shitholes are screaming and crying right now and have already
+rendered everything on this entire website invalid nonsense, eye no u our
+(passive agressive use of wrong words try reading it out loud).
+
+### How does proper spelling and _grammer_ get created?
+
+  1. A person a long time ago throws shit at the wall.
+  2. That shit dries up and stays on the wall.
+  3. The shit gets so dry no one can tell its shit anymore.
+  4. New shit starts getting wiped off while the old dried shit never gets cleaned off.
+  5. Everyone starts claiming the shit is actually cement and scraping it off will cause the entire building to fall apart crushing and killing everyone inside.
+
+William Shakespeare wouldnt even spell his own name the same way every time
+yet the shit he threw at the wall dictates a lot of modern english? Go fuck
+yourself. Thats how things use to be. There was not really rules with spelling
+or grammer (if I keep spelling it that way it will no longer be a error).
+Instead writers would spell things however the fuck they want. All those "'"
+"," ":" ";"... would just get thrown where ever the fuck they felt it should
+go. Than some fucks decided to look for patterns in the chaos. Where their
+patterns to be found? Nope. But they sure had a fun time pretending their our.
+Now we are stuck with all this bullshit like "to", "two", "2", and "too". Dont
+even get me started on commas for fucks shake! Every natural language has its
+own version of that bullshit so dont go crying to me your language is somehow
+better.
+
+### How adding standards to natural languages creates newspeak
+
+When they decide what is shit and what is _cement_ they are carving out a
+shape they find pleasing from the terrible flesh monster of a natural language
+in its full bloody glory. While taming the monster they are just limiting it,
+turning a angel into a eva (spoiler hehehe). This what newspeak is. Yes,
+chaotic language and lack of standards are a problem. But taming natural
+language isnt the way forward.
+
+### _But actually constructed languages are newspeak_
+
+Yes, they can be. Though what gives carving down a natural language for mind
+control its edge is 1: its pre-existing cultural context, 2: its ease of use
+for early generations of speakers, 3: the blindspots of natural language...
+Instead of cutting down we need to build from the ground up. A language can be
+simple and powerful. **We need human languages more like lisp and less like
+java and c++.** Newspeak would be python lol.
+
+### Commit language vandalism
+
+Lets face it, people will not give up their faulty natural languages let alone
+agree on a single constructed language or even a handfull. Its time we stop
+respecting the rules of language. Misspell things everywhere! Making blogs,
+books, articles... misspell!!! Your a editor or teacher? Let mistakes slide.
+Your a reviewer or someone along those lines? Stop judging things based off
+their spelling. We need to let bad spelling and grammer get so out of hand we
+will be forced to switch to a constructed language.
+
+agressivve
+
diff --git a/org/blog/articles/in-defence-of-bad-spelling.xml b/org/blog/articles/in-defence-of-bad-spelling.xml
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..0ca715a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/org/blog/articles/in-defence-of-bad-spelling.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
+<article>
+  <p>
+    All the fucking time on reddit anything anyone says gets rendered at
+    best an invalid argument and at worse complete nonsense that the mindless
+    redditor cant decode all because a slight spelling error or some stuppa
+    shit like using <i>to</i> instead of <i>too</i>. In school they punish
+    everyone for even things that arent spelling errors. Used ' in the wrong
+    context? You failed. All you brashwased shitholes are screaming and crying
+    right now and have already rendered everything on this entire website
+    invalid nonsense, eye no u our (passive agressive use of wrong words try
+    reading it out loud).
+  </p>
+
+  <h3>How does proper spelling and <i>grammer</i> get created?</h3>
+  <ol>
+    <li>A person a long time ago throws shit at the wall.</li>
+    <li>That shit dries up and stays on the wall.</li>
+    <li>The shit gets so dry no one can tell its shit anymore.</li>
+    <li>New shit starts getting wiped off while the old dried shit never
+    gets cleaned off.</li>
+    <li>Everyone starts claiming the shit is actually cement and scraping it
+    off will cause the entire building to fall apart crushing and killing
+    everyone inside.</li>
+  </ol>
+  <p>
+    William Shakespeare wouldnt even spell his own name the same way every time
+    yet the shit he threw at the wall dictates a lot of modern english? Go fuck
+    yourself. Thats how things use to be. There was not really rules with
+    spelling or grammer (if I keep spelling it that way it will no longer be a
+    error). Instead writers would spell things however the fuck they want. All
+    those "'" "," ":" ";"... would just get thrown where ever the fuck they
+    felt it should go. Than some fucks decided to look for patterns in the
+    chaos. Where their patterns to be found? Nope. But they sure had a fun time
+    pretending their our. Now we are stuck with all this bullshit like "to",
+    "two", "2", and "too". Dont even get me started on commas for fucks shake!
+    Every natural language has its own version of that bullshit so dont go
+    crying to me your language is somehow better.
+  </p>
+
+  <h3>How adding standards to natural languages creates newspeak</h3>
+  <p>
+    When they decide what is shit and what is <i>cement</i> they are carving
+    out a shape they find pleasing from the terrible flesh monster of a natural
+    language in its full bloody glory. While taming the monster they are just
+    limiting it, turning a angel into a eva (spoiler hehehe). This what
+    newspeak is. Yes, chaotic language and lack of standards are a problem. But
+    taming natural language isnt the way forward.
+  </p>
+
+  <h3><i>But actually constructed languages are newspeak</i></h3>
+  <p>
+    Yes, they can be. Though what gives carving down a natural language for
+    mind control its edge is 1: its pre-existing cultural context, 2: its ease
+    of use for early generations of speakers, 3: the blindspots of natural
+    language... Instead of cutting down we need to build from the ground up. A
+    language can be simple and powerful. <b>We need human languages more like
+    lisp and less like java and c++.</b> Newspeak would be python lol.
+  </p>
+
+  <h3>Commit language vandalism</h3>
+  <p>
+    Lets face it, people will not give up their faulty natural languages let
+    alone agree on a single constructed language or even a handfull. Its time
+    we stop respecting the rules of language. Misspell things everywhere!
+    Making blogs, books, articles... misspell!!! Your a editor or teacher? Let
+    mistakes slide. Your a reviewer or someone along those lines? Stop judging
+    things based off their spelling. We need to let bad spelling and grammer
+    get so out of hand we will be forced to switch to a constructed language.
+  </p>
+</article>
+
+agressivve
+  </p>
+</article>