1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
|
<article>
<p>
All the fucking time on reddit anything anyone says gets rendered at
best an invalid argument and at worse complete nonsense that the mindless
redditor cant decode all because a slight spelling error or some stuppa
shit like using <i>to</i> instead of <i>too</i>. In school they punish
everyone for even things that arent spelling errors. Used ' in the wrong
context? You failed. All you brashwased shitholes are screaming and crying
right now and have already rendered everything on this entire website
invalid nonsense, eye no u our (passive agressive use of wrong words try
reading it out loud).
</p>
<h3>How does proper spelling and <i>grammer</i> get created?</h3>
<ol>
<li>A person a long time ago throws shit at the wall.</li>
<li>That shit dries up and stays on the wall.</li>
<li>The shit gets so dry no one can tell its shit anymore.</li>
<li>New shit starts getting wiped off while the old dried shit never
gets cleaned off.</li>
<li>Everyone starts claiming the shit is actually cement and scraping it
off will cause the entire building to fall apart crushing and killing
everyone inside.</li>
</ol>
<p>
William Shakespeare wouldnt even spell his own name the same way every time
yet the shit he threw at the wall dictates a lot of modern english? Go fuck
yourself. Thats how things use to be. There was not really rules with
spelling or grammer (if I keep spelling it that way it will no longer be a
error). Instead writers would spell things however the fuck they want. All
those "'" "," ":" ";"... would just get thrown where ever the fuck they
felt it should go. Than some fucks decided to look for patterns in the
chaos. Where their patterns to be found? Nope. But they sure had a fun time
pretending their our. Now we are stuck with all this bullshit like "to",
"two", "2", and "too". Dont even get me started on commas for fucks shake!
Every natural language has its own version of that bullshit so dont go
crying to me your language is somehow better.
</p>
<h3>How adding standards to natural languages creates newspeak</h3>
<p>
When they decide what is shit and what is <i>cement</i> they are carving
out a shape they find pleasing from the terrible flesh monster of a natural
language in its full bloody glory. While taming the monster they are just
limiting it, turning a angel into a eva (spoiler hehehe). This what
newspeak is. Yes, chaotic language and lack of standards are a problem. But
taming natural language isnt the way forward.
</p>
<h3><i>But actually constructed languages are newspeak</i></h3>
<p>
Yes, they can be. Though what gives carving down a natural language for
mind control its edge is 1: its pre-existing cultural context, 2: its ease
of use for early generations of speakers, 3: the blindspots of natural
language... Instead of cutting down we need to build from the ground up. A
language can be simple and powerful. <b>We need human languages more like
lisp and less like java and c++.</b> Newspeak would be python lol.
</p>
<h3>Commit language vandalism</h3>
<p>
Lets face it, people will not give up their faulty natural languages let
alone agree on a single constructed language or even a handfull. Its time
we stop respecting the rules of language. Misspell things everywhere!
Making blogs, books, articles... misspell!!! Your a editor or teacher? Let
mistakes slide. Your a reviewer or someone along those lines? Stop judging
things based off their spelling. We need to let bad spelling and grammer
get so out of hand we will be forced to switch to a constructed language.
</p>
</article>
agressivve
</p>
</article>
|
