1 files changed, 74 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/org/blog/articles/in-defence-of-bad-spelling.xml b/org/blog/articles/in-defence-of-bad-spelling.xml
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..0ca715a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/org/blog/articles/in-defence-of-bad-spelling.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
+<article>
+  <p>
+    All the fucking time on reddit anything anyone says gets rendered at
+    best an invalid argument and at worse complete nonsense that the mindless
+    redditor cant decode all because a slight spelling error or some stuppa
+    shit like using <i>to</i> instead of <i>too</i>. In school they punish
+    everyone for even things that arent spelling errors. Used ' in the wrong
+    context? You failed. All you brashwased shitholes are screaming and crying
+    right now and have already rendered everything on this entire website
+    invalid nonsense, eye no u our (passive agressive use of wrong words try
+    reading it out loud).
+  </p>
+
+  <h3>How does proper spelling and <i>grammer</i> get created?</h3>
+  <ol>
+    <li>A person a long time ago throws shit at the wall.</li>
+    <li>That shit dries up and stays on the wall.</li>
+    <li>The shit gets so dry no one can tell its shit anymore.</li>
+    <li>New shit starts getting wiped off while the old dried shit never
+    gets cleaned off.</li>
+    <li>Everyone starts claiming the shit is actually cement and scraping it
+    off will cause the entire building to fall apart crushing and killing
+    everyone inside.</li>
+  </ol>
+  <p>
+    William Shakespeare wouldnt even spell his own name the same way every time
+    yet the shit he threw at the wall dictates a lot of modern english? Go fuck
+    yourself. Thats how things use to be. There was not really rules with
+    spelling or grammer (if I keep spelling it that way it will no longer be a
+    error). Instead writers would spell things however the fuck they want. All
+    those "'" "," ":" ";"... would just get thrown where ever the fuck they
+    felt it should go. Than some fucks decided to look for patterns in the
+    chaos. Where their patterns to be found? Nope. But they sure had a fun time
+    pretending their our. Now we are stuck with all this bullshit like "to",
+    "two", "2", and "too". Dont even get me started on commas for fucks shake!
+    Every natural language has its own version of that bullshit so dont go
+    crying to me your language is somehow better.
+  </p>
+
+  <h3>How adding standards to natural languages creates newspeak</h3>
+  <p>
+    When they decide what is shit and what is <i>cement</i> they are carving
+    out a shape they find pleasing from the terrible flesh monster of a natural
+    language in its full bloody glory. While taming the monster they are just
+    limiting it, turning a angel into a eva (spoiler hehehe). This what
+    newspeak is. Yes, chaotic language and lack of standards are a problem. But
+    taming natural language isnt the way forward.
+  </p>
+
+  <h3><i>But actually constructed languages are newspeak</i></h3>
+  <p>
+    Yes, they can be. Though what gives carving down a natural language for
+    mind control its edge is 1: its pre-existing cultural context, 2: its ease
+    of use for early generations of speakers, 3: the blindspots of natural
+    language... Instead of cutting down we need to build from the ground up. A
+    language can be simple and powerful. <b>We need human languages more like
+    lisp and less like java and c++.</b> Newspeak would be python lol.
+  </p>
+
+  <h3>Commit language vandalism</h3>
+  <p>
+    Lets face it, people will not give up their faulty natural languages let
+    alone agree on a single constructed language or even a handfull. Its time
+    we stop respecting the rules of language. Misspell things everywhere!
+    Making blogs, books, articles... misspell!!! Your a editor or teacher? Let
+    mistakes slide. Your a reviewer or someone along those lines? Stop judging
+    things based off their spelling. We need to let bad spelling and grammer
+    get so out of hand we will be forced to switch to a constructed language.
+  </p>
+</article>
+
+agressivve
+  </p>
+</article>