aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/org/blog/articles/the-death-of-counterculture.xml
blob: 852c7a1cc18e06bb94814c429df923eb7d2975e3 (plain) (blame)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
<article>
  <p>
    Now days inclusiveness, diversity, lgbtq+... are all associated to
    corporations, governments, and all those nasty power structures. How did
    this happen?! Those things should be against the system, power, and
    control. Why are powerful people and power structures using these things
    for their own use? Why are the same people claiming to be against the power
    rejecting certain subgroups of the working class? Shouldn't it be the
    working class against the ruling?! To answer these questions here is a
    <b>very rough</b> overview of progressive history.
  </p>

  <h2>Enlightenment</h2>
  <p>
    Quite a ways back in europe thinkers started to come together and ask
    questions and search for answers. They looked back at philosophy from way
    before their own time and started coming up with new ways of thinking
    themselves. This was a world controlled by kings and churches and the new
    ways of thinking brought their power into question. Instead of blind faith
    people started to use logic and reason. Science, art, and technology took
    off. Growing distaste for the old ways and conditions for a new way brought
    about revolution in many places some notable ones being the french
    revolution and the american revolution.

    Its a common misunderstanding that the french revolution was the poor
    against the rich. What really happened was there was a growing middle class
    known as the bourgeoisie. They were once small in numbers and power but
    were quickly becoming a economic and intellectual force ready to take on
    the world. The growing dislike towards the kings and aristocrats, a new up
    and coming class, and poor people in need of better conditions lead to the
    bourgeoisie uprising. After generations of bourgeoisie in power they ended
    up replacing the kings and aristocrats they destroyed. People who once
    talked about logic and reason, freedom and liberty... are now the ones
    aiming to keep working class people others dumb and compliant. Even though
    democracy and liberty wise we are back on square one all this didnt happen
    in vain. New technology and ideas have been brought into the world that can
    bring about things far greater than what the enlightenment age thinkers
    could ever imagine. Its just a manner and leveraging new conditions in the
    favor of freedom and liberty.
  </p>

  <h2>Post enlightenment</h2>
  <p>
    The enlightenment thinkers nearly set the framework for history following
    that time. A lot has happened since than. Some notable thinkers after them
    are Darwin, Hegel, and Marx. Darwin changed the way we understand
    species and biology. Hegel improved the way we understand the mind, the
    world, and the way everything you observe interacts. Marx applied those
    concepts among others to understand the problems of post enlightenment
    society and created a framework for understand historical change. Since the
    cycle of new ways, new rulers, and new ideas improving things only to take
    hold and turn to shit been observed the question now is how do we break
    free of that cycle? If society evolves and changes in the same manner that
    biology does than the hope is society will one day evolve to fulfill
    material needs, freedom, and liberty. How do we ensure this future?
  </p>

  <h2>The progressive movement</h2>
  <p>
    A growing dislike of the bourgeoisie, and these new ideas lead to a new
    movement. Workers unionized and went on strike, laws against child labor
    got made, company towns got taken down, food regulations got put in place
    to stop food companies from poisoning everyone. One of the greatest (least
    shitty) american presidents of all time, Theodore Roosevelt himself helped
    the movement with his admirable amount of stubbornness. The game monopoly
    was created by a anti-landlord activist and follower of Henry
    George. Around the world the seeds for socialism, communism, and anarchy
    were being planted.
  </p>

  <p>
    "Thinking is the best way to travel" - The Moody Blues.
  </p>

  <h2>Authoritarianism</h2>
  <p>
    Many were feeling that people aren't smart enough for democracy. They felt
    that <i>free-market</i> and worker controlled means of production are just
    two sides of the same coin. They wanted to go back to the world of kings,
    mono-cultures, and state churches. They saw the working class as a bunch of
    dumb chaotic people who need someone bigger and smarter to think for
    them. Many looked at darwnism and thought that maybe the same can be said
    for rulers. That the strongest best leader takes control and its their duty
    and right to rule. They also looked at the masses and thought about
    selective breeding them to be more compliant like farm animals. The
    enlightenment thinkers left a hole. Their ideas of free will and logic
    didn't include everyone. Under their framework you can quite easily say not
    everyone can think with free will and logic and those who don't should be
    lead and controlled by those who do.
  </p>

  <h2>War</h2>
  <p>
    Around the around those authoritarian and progressive ideas didn't
    always clash. Sometimes they merged. People were growing distrustful of new
    ways because of economic and social issues but were still tired of the
    old. New fears gave people with answers power and control. Fascism and
    nazism started spreading. In russia the communist movements to played into
    it. They decide instead of breaking the pattern of control to leverage the
    pattern of control. Freedom and liberty were no longer seen as
    important. The nazis and new age communists (they weren't much like the
    originals) fucking hated each other for this. Each one demanded a level of
    control that multiple empires can't all have. <b>The driving force behind
    fighting nazis wasn't a moral one but a practical one</b>. After everything
    was over the same people fighting nazis shared similar ideas. America used
    the war to gain alliances with other nations and grow to a economic and
    military power even though it didn't do much of the fighting. A lot of
    americas felt like they fought the wrong enemy though admitting that is
    dangerous after all the nazis committed so many unmoral actions. American
    ideas, nazi ideas, and a wall of lies lead way to neoliberalism.
  </p>

  <h2>Neoliberalism</h2>
  <p>
    All the american solders who fought a war that wasn't theirs returned home
    as the good guys but with the ideology of the bad guys. The most powerful
    of both worlds. Why just beat the nazis when we can replace them is what
    they ask. Nationalism, christianity, eugenics, racism, sexism,
    ablism... were all given a place to grow. German scientists who created
    nazi weapons were brought to america to finish were the nazis left off. The
    new enemies were the communists. In russia they were also leveraging post
    war conditions. The weapons became so advanced that now any powerful nation
    can destroy the entire earth with a press of a button. In the past if a
    nation had a super powerful weapon they would use it gladly. Now that a
    weapon that can destroy the whole planet existed and all sides had them
    war leaders had to reframe from using their most deadly weapon. This gave
    birth to the cold war. Meanwhile in america there was a rising middle class
    and countries being rebuilt under american investments would soon
    follow. This middle class being made up of that ex-solders.
  </p>

  <h2>Counterculture</h2>
  <p>
    The middle class of ex-solders had a hell ton of children. These children
    were born and grew up in the most calm time period in a long time yet the
    pattern of control was more clear than ever to anyone watching from the
    side lines. The world they grew up in was completely different than the one
    past generations knew. New ideas and technology radicalized pulled the
    entire world into a new age. As they grew up they slowly learned they lived
    in a world built on lies but they couldn't quite put their finger on
    it. Pointless war and pointless violence everywhere. Easier access to
    psychedelics interacted with a growing awareness of the pattern of
    control. Better education served as a double sided sword for the new
    control. It needed smart people to operate the new complex technological
    world yet education can lead to new enlightenment and breaking free of the
    rulers of the world. The young started creating their own culture. One of
    new music, new ways to get wasted... The old get drunk in bars while the
    young got high at rock concerts. They concluded the issues with the world
    to be a cultural one. The powers of the world spread a culture of control
    and violence. Instead we need a culture of peace and love. The civil rights
    movement, women's rights movements, gay rights movements all hit center
    stage. Every action the leaders did to counteract the new movement only
    verified what the hippies already knew.
  </p>

  <h2>The death of counterculture</h2>
  <p>
    The hole with counterculture is it saw things through a more cultural lens
    and lacked more economic and historical ones that other progressive
    movements had. It was a grass roots movement that as a whole lacked much of
    the deep philosophy progressive thinkers been coming up with and improving
    upon since the beginning of written history. Counterculture was simply glue
    of peace and love holding together a bunch of hippies and
    activists. Counterculture was still deeply capitalist since it was only a
    cultural revolution that it pushed for. Wood stock was all profits and
    business under the hood. All the counterculture artists spreading peace and
    love were feeding back into the capitalist system. All the hippies were
    plucked from the fields and put in the corporate offices. The system can't
    defeat them so it joined them and profited off it. The businesses and
    governments were painted colorful yet its still the same walls
    underneath. Steve jobs was a hippie tripping on LSD on a farm before he
    started apple. The military now <i>spreads democracy</i> instead of take
    over countries. Yes, this is very america centered but everything an empire
    does spreads. Counterculture crossed the sea back and forward many
    times. With the hippies in control of the world its now seen as good to be
    a little progressive but pushing for ideas progressive enough to actually
    do anything is labeled extremest. A company only has to be moral enough to
    not be boycotted. Slavery was out sourced far away. Out of sight out of
    mind. Making the pattern of control less painful is encouraged but breaking
    the pattern is fought against just as much.
  </p>

  <h2>The reactionaries</h2>
  <p>
    A system dominated by strong white men was being replaced. Women, black
    people, gays... were making their way into the governments and
    corporations. This was seen as a threat so many doubled down on the
    post-war version of the status quo. They saw new capitalism as weak and
    blamed all their issues on it. Nostalgia as we know it was born. "Things
    were better before <i>insert anything here</i>". "If the hippies like peace
    and love than lets spread hate and violence". The reactionaries never think
    deeper than that. They only think about what is instead of what can
    be. They concluded that if the present sucks than we should go back to the
    past. They fail to envision a better future. That's the whole point behind
    "make america great again". How they see it is the pattern of control was
    in their favor but now its out of their favor. Removing the pattern of
    control is out of the question.
  </p>

  <h2>To finish things up</h2>
  <p>
    Make sure to spend time going outside, learning new skills, reading cool
    books, and listening to good music. Don't fall for the traps the system has
    set. Things will not improve much until we break this pattern. I call for a
    new type of revolution. This blog post was partly inspired by
    <a href="https://youtube.com/watch?v=nST5BggdfUs" target="_blank">
      this video
    </a>. Do check it out (: Love you all stay safe and keep your eyes open :D
  </p>
</article>