1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
|
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<title>The philosophy commune</title>
<style>
body {
color: black;
background-image: url('images/philosophy_commune_background.jpg');
}
table {
color: black;
background-color: #bebebe;
margin-top: 10px;
margin-bottom: 10px;
margin-left: 10px;
margin-right: 10px;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<center>
<h1>The philosophy commune</h1>
<table border="1" width="60%">
<tr>
<td>
<h2>Yes, I am a evil commie.</h2>
<p>
In this very "well" designed web page I will layout the basics of what socialism and communism really is
(not the stuff that the bourgeoisie have lead everyone to believe) and what it means to be a commie.
<br/><br/>
While I don't know as much on this topic as a lot of other commies I can at least give you a start.
I will focus more on the philosophy behind it all before even touching everything else.
<br/><br/>
Sections:
</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="#start">the start</a></li>
<li><a href="#abstract">the abstract</a></li>
<li><a href="#dialectics">the dialectics</a></li>
<li><a href="#applied">the applied</a></li>
</ul>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<h2><a href="index.html">Back to main page</a></h2>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<table border="1" width="60%">
<tr>
<td>
<h2 id="start">The start</h2>
<p>
This place is called the philosophy commune because Its more focused on the philosophy and
how it interacts with communism then it is with the politics. Its a common misunderstanding
that marxism is some crazy cult like political ideology (some marxist groups are tbh) though
if you read any real writing of Karl Marx or Friedrich Engels you will find mostly philosophy
and it being applied in more abstract ways instead of the lies we have been given. To understand
topics like economics and politics its important to first understand philosophy as the base for
everything else. Start out at any wikipedia page and continue clicking the first link
and you will either reach the philosophy wiki page or get stuck in a endless loop.
<br/><br/>
Every complete ideology has a base made up of more abstract philosophy. For example classical and neo
liberalism has many layers like right of the individual and private property rights and the way
liberalism treats it is more or less connected to christian ideas like the idea that some people
are closer to god then others so under liberalism right of the individual is more then just freedom
but the idea that some people are narcissisticly above others and that government limiting there
power over other people is going against nature or "gods will" in a sense. Because of this
liberalism allows for people to do nothing but limit rights and freedom, call it rights and
freedom, then get away from it. "Oh no, a new law proteching users from having google
forcefully installing a microship in peoples heads is going to hurt googles holy rights
and god given status over the people. This is anti-american to give people that choice
to not have google install microchips in there head". As you can see there are many layers to
liberalism like the often misunderstood morals and bits of christian ideas and much more
I will not get into now and BTW when I target liberalism I am also targetting conservatism
because conservatism is still a form of liberalism.
<br/><br/>
Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels created a philosophy called dialectical materialism and
used it for historical materialism which is how they understood history and they used
this to understand how society changes in mainly western countries (Russia wasn't really
included in this so they had to work off of dialectical materialism and build up there
own home cooked appied ideas for there revolution). With there philosophy marx and
engels analyzed there current capitalist society and understanding of how
the bourgeoisie (capital owning class) and proletariat (working class) interact
with each other and found the exploitation between the two and how it upholds
capitalism. Marx and Engels believe that like how the bourgeoisie lead a
revolution to gain freedom from the kings and lords of the past the
proletariat leading there own revolution for freedom from the bourgeoisie
is needed for society to progress. The philosophy behind liberalism should
make more sense now knowing that liberalism is the ideology of the
bourgeoisie class.
</p>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<table border="1" width="60%">
<tr>
<td>
<h2 id="abstract">The abstract</h2>
<p>
Before getting into dialectical materialism and that stuff I will go into my own ideas
which are even more abstract but a good place to build on to understand the dialectics.
Just bare with me while I throw your brain into a microwave and forgot about it for a
while without even knowing its burning (like the way microwave popcorn got banned at
school).
</p>
<h3>Verbs and nouns</h3>
<p>
In english we rely on nouns a lot to talk about things. Everytime we use a noun
we are refecancing a thing or idea so we can talk about it. We can talk about
how the thing looks like x-mas barf, smells like a dogs ass (I don't want to know
how you know what a dogs ass smells like), feels like the random
thing you found outside you wish you didn't touch...<br/>
but what if I told you there are other ways to talk about things!<br/>
<img src="https://media1.tenor.com/m/fyf4BI5DSyIAAAAC/red-pill-vista.gif" alt="_target" width="50%"/>
<br/>
A language where everything is called out by the action of it existing could exist.
While the grammer of english is yelling a big "fuck you!" (like with everything I write)
something like instead of "its a cat" "it be a cat" could exist and be normalized in the grammer
and have the words planned out for it to make sense in its context. Also languages can have no verbs
sense nouns also cover ideas so instead of the action of running it would be the idea of running.
Take a look at <a href="https://mw.lojban.org/papri/Are_verbs,_nouns_and_adjectives_real%3F" target="_blank">
how lojban handles this shit</a> for some mind opening ideas.
</p>
<h3>Overthinking shit</h3>
<p>
I shall start us with a simple math problem: x^2=1 solve for x. It has two correct answers:
x=1 and x=-1. If something like this pops up in a math problem you can only use 1 or -1
for the problem and it will effect the final requests of the problem though entail you
solve it the problem is in a state of having two possible outcomes. Its just like Schrödinger's cat
where you have a box with the dead/alive cat in it you can walk around town with your
funky little dead/alive cat, go on a romantic date with your dead/alive cat, throw it into
oncoming traffic to know for sure its fucking dead /hj... but entail you open the box its
in a state of both but once its open you have a dead cat or a alive cat like how x^2=1
is both 1 and -1 entail used.
<br/><br/>
Another idea to think about is numbers like pi. If you
have a forumal for pi you bascially have every single digit of pi in a set of instructions
but you can't use them. You have to apply the forumal first but it will go on forever
if you do that so x+generate_pi() wouldn't work. Instead you would only use so many
digits of pi like this x+generate_pi(16) for 16 digits. We could in place of every
magic number use a generator to be able to fine tune how everything is generated and
applied. To keep everything constantant we could use generators for every number and
treat operators as functions and use things like lazy evaluation,
strict evaluation... to direction the flow of are logic for whatever we are doing.
You can read about this kind of stuff in
<a href="https://mitp-content-server.mit.edu/books/content/sectbyfn/books_pres_0/6515/sicp.zip/index.html" target="_blank">
Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs</a>.
<br/><br/>
To continue with my madness
we could compare this to the verb and noun thing and say that functions are like verbs
and numbers are like nouns. yet we refecance the function as a noun and its made up of
instructions which are things but those things are verbs because they define the actions
of doing things then we can grab that logic of it being a refrecance to the thing then
go through the same steps on the instructions... what doth life?!
<br/><br/>
Back to x^2=1 there are things I call logic gabs. Are society pushes a very linear and isolated
"if this and that then that and this" kind of logic. Peoples minds get fried when shown things
like x^2=1 kind of like a computer going mad when asked "what doth life?!". While more standard
thinking is more newton cradle like with "this causes that" we live in a world that is closer
to a bunch of marbles of different sizes thrown into a box then shaked around and thrown everywhere.
Talking about what causes what is too much for are tiny stupido minds to understand with all those
marbles getting thrown around so instead we can think about the relationship between the marbles
and how they interact with each other. We could look at the way the big and small marbles react
when they hit each other and how it effects the movement of the marbles in the box. There is no
supreme lord marble or any of that shit. Just a bunch of marbles getting fucked up when I
decide to throw the box into oncoming traffic.
</p>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<table border="1" width="60%">
<tr>
<td>
<h2 id="dialectics">The dialectics</h2>
<p>
I am not going to go much into dialectics because
A: The abstract shit I went into has the infomation you need to know to understand dialectics.
B: You can watch a fucking youtube video you fucker. To sum things up with dialectics we
describe the relationship between different things to understand them.
<br/><br/>
To understand Marx's dialectics we need to understand idealism vs materialism. Karl Marx
read lots of Hegel (the old dude no one understands) and Hegel was very idealist and his
idealism is all about the mind and spirit and how they shape reality. Idealists believe
that everything around us is shaped by are own mind. "If a tree falls and no one is
around to hear it does it make a sound?" is a common question used to bring forward
idealist ideas because it shows that senory feelings exist in the mind and not in
the world around us and that every single thing we see and feel is in are mind and
not the world around us. Materialism is about the world around us and believes
that matter is the base of reality. Vulgar materialism as blunty as possible
states that everything is just matter and a common example of vulgar materialism
is kicking a stone to prove its existance. Karl Marx is a materialist but not
a vulgar materialist. For understanding things vulgar materialism really
isn't that helpful.
<br/><br/>
Karl Marx's dialectical materialism is often thought of a materialist version
of Hegel's dialectics though I like to think of it as more of a dialectic
between idealism and materialism being applied on other things as a way to understand the
world. Karl Marx applied his dialectical materialism to history to create historical materialism.
Its a view of history where instead of being centered around the actions of one great
leader or key events like some big ass battle its more about different ideas floating around,
ideas things and people interacting with each other, changes in conditions in the world...
Karl Marx believes that people are shaped by there envirtment and not just destined to be
something. A rich man is rich because he was born into a rich family, was in the right place
at the right time... and not because he "had that rich chad alpha mindset and pulled himself
up by the bootstraps". Karl Marx isn't discrediting anyones work put
into something but more of saying that the conditions someone is in is important to how
they grow as a person and how there effort interacts with the world.
<br/></br>
A good example is trumps "small loan" of a million dollars. He brags about building up his company
from a loan of a million dollars to make it sound like he was a average guy who
built up a empire from hardwork and mindset alone when really being able to
grow up seeing how his dad handles real estate and getting to met other people
in that business and having his family name as a symbol is priceless and really
impacts the future of someone. Somone growing up in a average household isn't
going to get to learn all the insider secrets of real estate at a young age
in a time without internet then grow up to be given a loan of money bigger then
any amount any normal person will ever touch to apply there knowledge to conitnue
spreading the family empire.
<br/><br/>
A did a TERRIBLE job with Marx's dialectics so please read Marx's shit instead of taking
my word on anything. I am a tired lazy fuck that isn't to be trusted about anything.
</p>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<table border="1" width="60%">
<tr>
<td>
<h2 id="applied">The applied</h2>
<p>
Just like how I talked about that a function that generates pi exists in a abstract form
and has all the digits of pi entail applied I think of marxism the same way. There is
the more abstract parts of marxism like dialectical materialism and historical materialsm
then there is the applied marxism like the science of revolution and all the stuff
about the bourgeoisie exploiting the proletariat.
<br/><br/>
When people say that marxism is
a science they don't mean the science you learned in school but instead they mean
wissenschaft which is more about learning, studying, and understanding the world instead
of just the search for truth like how we know it today. Wissenschaft is more broad
and includes things like art and religion as long as its the search for knowledge.
Also in marxism the term socialism is used more broadly. Because of decades of the
red scare its meaning have been completely fucked up. Karl marx often used socialism
to describe the idea of things along the line of any form of social ownership of
the means of production, modern society planned around a need or idea... He
would describe people we would now know as conservatism as something like
"petty-bourgeois socialism" meaning socialism made for the petty-bourgeois
(small business owners).
<br/><br/>
Communism means stateless, classless, moneyless society
and to be a communist doesn't mean you are setting that as your up front idea
of what needs to be done now but instead supporting a form of socialism that
brings us closer to that. As a communist I believe in the bourgeoisie class
coming to an end and the means of production being controlled by the proletariat.
The government we know is nearly just part of bourgeoisie society. The government
is ran by and actively supports the bourgeoisie. It sets laws that gives
companies copy rights that make sure even just there ideas can't be touched
by the proletariat or petty-bourgeoisie that are a risk to the big companies.
One isse with liberalism is it sees big companies and government as isolated entities.
With that mindset they will often support government thinking its keeping them safe
from the bourgeoisie or support the bourgeoisie keeping them safe from the government.
<br/><br/>
I completely fucked this up so PLEASE read good shit like
<a href="https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1880/soc-utop/index.htm" target="_blank">
Socialism: Utopian and Scientific
</a>.
</p>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</center>
</body>
</html>
|
