Pretty much good to go with the abstract stuff

1 files changed, 151 insertions, 112 deletions

diff --git a/the_philosophy_commune.html b/the_philosophy_commune.html
index aa131cd..4da7fb7 100644
--- a/the_philosophy_commune.html
+++ b/the_philosophy_commune.html
@@ -45,127 +45,166 @@ table {
                     <ul>
                         <li><a href="#start">the start</a></li>
                         <li><a href="#abstract">the abstract</a></li>
+                        <li><a href="#dialectics">the dialectics</a></li>
                         <li><a href="#applied">the applied</a></li>
                     </ul>
                 </td>
+            </tr>
 
-                <tr>
-                    <td>
-                        <h2><a href="index.html">Back to main page</a></h2>
-                    </td>
-                </tr>
+            <tr>
+                <td>
+                    <h2><a href="index.html">Back to main page</a></h2>
+                </td>
             </tr>
+        </table>
 
-            <table border="1" width="60%">
-                <tr>
-                    <td>
-                        <h2 id="start">The start</h2>
-                        <p>
-                            This place is called the philosophy commune because Its more focused on the philosophy and
-                            how it interacts with communism then it is with the politics. Its a common misunderstanding
-                            that marxism is some crazy cult like political ideology (some marxist groups are tbh) though
-                            if you read any real writing of Karl Marx or Friedrich Engels you will find mostly philosophy
-                            and it being applied in more abstract ways instead of the lies we have been given. To understand
-                            topics like economics and politics its important to first understand philosophy as the base for
-                            everything else. Start out at any wikipedia page and continue clicking the first link
-                            and you will either reach the philosophy wiki page or get stuck in a endless loop.
-                            <br/><br/>
+        <table border="1" width="60%">
+            <tr>
+                <td>
+                    <h2 id="start">The start</h2>
+                    <p>
+                        This place is called the philosophy commune because Its more focused on the philosophy and
+                        how it interacts with communism then it is with the politics. Its a common misunderstanding
+                        that marxism is some crazy cult like political ideology (some marxist groups are tbh) though
+                        if you read any real writing of Karl Marx or Friedrich Engels you will find mostly philosophy
+                        and it being applied in more abstract ways instead of the lies we have been given. To understand
+                        topics like economics and politics its important to first understand philosophy as the base for
+                        everything else. Start out at any wikipedia page and continue clicking the first link
+                        and you will either reach the philosophy wiki page or get stuck in a endless loop.
+                        <br/><br/>
 
-                            Every complete ideology has a base made up of more abstract philosophy. For example classical and neo
-                            liberalism has many layers like right of the individual and private property rights and the way
-                            liberalism treats it is more or less connected to christian ideas like the idea that some people
-                            are closer to god then others so under liberalism right of the individual is more then just freedom
-                            but the idea that some people are narcissisticly above others and that government limiting there
-                            power over other people is going against nature or "gods will" in a sense. Because of this 
-                            liberalism allows for people to do nothing but limit rights and freedom, call it rights and
-                            freedom, then get away from it. "Oh no, a new law proteching users from having google
-                            forcefully installing a microship in peoples heads is going to hurt googles holy rights
-                            and god given status over the people. This is anti-american to give people that choice
-                            to not have google install microchips in there head". As you can see there are many layers to
-                            liberalism like the often misunderstood morals and bits of christian ideas and much more
-                            I will not get into now and BTW when I target liberalism I am also targetting conservatism
-                            because conservatism is still a form of liberalism.
-                            <br/><br/>
-                            
-                            Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels created a philosophy called dialectical materialism and
-                            used it for historical materialism which is how they understood history and they used
-                            this to understand how society changes in mainly western countries (Russia wasn't really
-                            included in this so they had to work off of dialectical materialism and build up there
-                            own home cooked appied ideas for there revolution). With there philosophy marx and
-                            engels analyzed there current capitalist society and understanding of how 
-                            the bourgeoisie (capital owning class) and proletariat (working class) interact
-                            with each other and found the exploitation between the two and how it upholds
-                            capitalism. Marx and Engels believe that like how the bourgeoisie lead a 
-                            revolution to gain freedom from the kings and lords of the past the
-                            proletariat leading there own revolution for freedom from the bourgeoisie
-                            is needed for society to progress. The philosophy behind liberalism should
-                            make more sense now knowing that liberalism is the ideology of the
-                            bourgeoisie class.
-                        </p>
-                    </td>
-                </tr>
-            </table>
+                        Every complete ideology has a base made up of more abstract philosophy. For example classical and neo
+                        liberalism has many layers like right of the individual and private property rights and the way
+                        liberalism treats it is more or less connected to christian ideas like the idea that some people
+                        are closer to god then others so under liberalism right of the individual is more then just freedom
+                        but the idea that some people are narcissisticly above others and that government limiting there
+                        power over other people is going against nature or "gods will" in a sense. Because of this 
+                        liberalism allows for people to do nothing but limit rights and freedom, call it rights and
+                        freedom, then get away from it. "Oh no, a new law proteching users from having google
+                        forcefully installing a microship in peoples heads is going to hurt googles holy rights
+                        and god given status over the people. This is anti-american to give people that choice
+                        to not have google install microchips in there head". As you can see there are many layers to
+                        liberalism like the often misunderstood morals and bits of christian ideas and much more
+                        I will not get into now and BTW when I target liberalism I am also targetting conservatism
+                        because conservatism is still a form of liberalism.
+                        <br/><br/>
+                        
+                        Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels created a philosophy called dialectical materialism and
+                        used it for historical materialism which is how they understood history and they used
+                        this to understand how society changes in mainly western countries (Russia wasn't really
+                        included in this so they had to work off of dialectical materialism and build up there
+                        own home cooked appied ideas for there revolution). With there philosophy marx and
+                        engels analyzed there current capitalist society and understanding of how 
+                        the bourgeoisie (capital owning class) and proletariat (working class) interact
+                        with each other and found the exploitation between the two and how it upholds
+                        capitalism. Marx and Engels believe that like how the bourgeoisie lead a 
+                        revolution to gain freedom from the kings and lords of the past the
+                        proletariat leading there own revolution for freedom from the bourgeoisie
+                        is needed for society to progress. The philosophy behind liberalism should
+                        make more sense now knowing that liberalism is the ideology of the
+                        bourgeoisie class.
+                    </p>
+                </td>
+            </tr>
+        </table>
+
+        <table border="1" width="60%">
+            <tr>
+                <td>
+                    <h2 id="abstract">The abstract</h2>
+                    <p>
+                        Before getting into dialectical materialism and that stuff I will go into my own ideas
+                        which are even more abstract but a good place to build on to understand the dialectics.
+                        Just bare with me while I throw your brain into a microwave and forgot about it for a
+                        while without even knowing its burning (like the way microwave popcorn got banned at
+                        school).
+                    </p>
+                    <h3>Verbs and nouns</h3>
+                    <p>
+                        In english we rely on nouns a lot to talk about things. Everytime we use a noun
+                        we are refecancing a thing or idea so we can talk about it. We can talk about
+                        how the thing looks like x-mas barf, smells like a dogs ass (I don't want to know 
+                        how you know what a dogs ass smells like), feels like the random
+                        thing you found outside you wish you didn't touch...<br/>
+                        but what if I told you there are other ways to talk about things!<br/>
+                        <img src="https://media1.tenor.com/m/fyf4BI5DSyIAAAAC/red-pill-vista.gif" alt="_target" width="50%"/>
+                        <br/>
+                        A language where everything is called out by the action of it existing could exist.
+                        While the grammer of english is yelling a big "fuck you!" (like with everything I write)
+                        something like instead of "its a cat" "it be a cat" could exist and be normalized in the grammer
+                        and have the words planned out for it to make sense in its context. Also languages can have no verbs
+                        sense nouns also cover ideas so instead of the action of running it would be the idea of running.
+                        Take a look at <a href="https://mw.lojban.org/papri/Are_verbs,_nouns_and_adjectives_real%3F" target="_blank">
+                        how lojban handles this shit</a> for some mind opening ideas.
+                    </p>
+                    <h3>Overthinking shit</h3>
+                    <p>
+                        I shall start us with a simple math problem: x^2=1 solve for x. It has two correct answers:
+                        x=1 and x=-1. If something like this pops up in a math problem you can only use 1 or -1
+                        for the problem and it will effect the final requests of the problem though entail you
+                        solve it the problem is in a state of having two possible outcomes. Its just like Schrödinger's cat
+                        where you have a box with the dead/alive cat in it you can walk around town with your
+                        funky little dead/alive cat, go on a romantic date with your dead/alive cat, throw it into
+                        oncoming traffic to know for sure its fucking dead /hj... but entail you open the box its
+                        in a state of both but once its open you have a dead cat or a alive cat like how x^2=1
+                        is both 1 and -1 entail used.
+                        <br/><br/>
+                        Another idea to think about is numbers like pi. If you
+                        have a forumal for pi you bascially have every single digit of pi in a set of instructions
+                        but you can't use them. You have to apply the forumal first but it will go on forever
+                        if you do that so x+generate_pi() wouldn't work. Instead you would only use so many
+                        digits of pi like this x+generate_pi(16) for 16 digits. We could in place of every
+                        magic number use a generator to be able to fine tune how everything is generated and
+                        applied. To keep everything constantant we could use generators for every number and
+                        treat operators as functions and use things like lazy evaluation,
+                        strict evaluation... to direction the flow of are logic for whatever we are doing.
+                        You can read about this kind of stuff in
+                        <a href="https://mitp-content-server.mit.edu/books/content/sectbyfn/books_pres_0/6515/sicp.zip/index.html" target="_blank">
+                        Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs</a>.
+                        <br/><br/>
+                        To continue with my madness
+                        we could compare this to the verb and noun thing and say that functions are like verbs
+                        and numbers are like nouns. yet we refecance the function as a noun and its made up of
+                        instructions which are things but those things are verbs because they define the actions
+                        of doing things then we can grab that logic of it being a refrecance to the thing then
+                        go through the same steps on the instructions... what doth life?!
+                        <br/><br/>
+                        Back to x^2=1 there are things I call logic gabs. Are society pushes a very linear and isolated
+                        "if this and that then that and this" kind of logic. Peoples minds get fried when shown things
+                        like x^2=1 kind of like a computer going mad when asked "what doth life?!". While more standard
+                        thinking is more newton cradle like with "this causes that" we live in a world that is closer
+                        to a bunch of marbles of different sizes thrown into a box then shaked around and thrown everywhere.
+                        Talking about what causes what is too much for are tiny stupido minds to understand with all those
+                        marbles getting thrown around so instead we can think about the relationship between the marbles
+                        and how they interact with each other. We could look at the way the big and small marbles react
+                        when they hit each other and how it effects the movement of the marbles in the box. There is no
+                        supreme lord marble or any of that shit. Just a bunch of marbles getting fucked up when I
+                        decide to throw the box into oncoming traffic.
+                    </p>
+                </td>
+            </tr>
+        </table>
 
-            <table border="1" width="60%">
-                <tr>
-                    <td>
-                        <h2 id="abstract">The abstract</h2>
-                        <p>
-                            Before getting into dialectical materialism and that stuff I will go into my own ideas
-                            which are even more abstract but a good place to build on to understand the dialectics.
-                            Just bare with me while I throw your brain into a microwave and forgot about it for a
-                            while without even knowing its burning (like the way microwave popcorn got banned at
-                            school).
-                        </p>
-                        <h3>Verbs and nouns</h3>
-                        <p>
-                            In english we rely on nouns a lot to talk about things. Everytime we use a noun
-                            we are refecancing a thing or idea so we can talk about it. We can talk about
-                            how the thing looks like x-mas barf, smells like a dogs ass (I don't want to know 
-                            how you know what a dogs ass smells like), feels like the random
-                            thing you found outside you wish you didn't touch...<br/>
-                            but what if I told you there are other ways to talk about things!<br/>
-                            <img src="https://media1.tenor.com/m/fyf4BI5DSyIAAAAC/red-pill-vista.gif" alt="_target" width="50%"/>
-                        </p>
-                        <h3>Overthinking shit</h3>
-                        <p>
-                            I shall start us with a simple math problem: x^2=1 solve for x. It has two correct answers:
-                            x=1 and x=-1. If something like this pops up in a math problem you can only use 1 or -1
-                            for the problem and it will effect the final requests of the problem though entail you
-                            solve it the problem is in a state of having two possible outcomes. Its just like Schrödinger's cat
-                            where you have a box with the dead/alive cat in it you can walk around town with your
-                            funky little dead/alive cat, go on a romantic date with your dead/alive cat, throw it into
-                            oncoming traffic to know for sure its fucking dead /hj... but entail you open the box its
-                            in a state of both but once its open you have a dead cat or a alive cat like how x^2=1
-                            is both 1 and -1 entail used.
-                            <br/><br/>
-                            Another idea to think about is numbers like pi. If you
-                            have a forumal for pi you bascially have every single digit of pi in a set of instructions
-                            but you can't use them. You have to apply the forumal first but it will go on forever
-                            if you do that so x+generate_pi() wouldn't work. Instead you would only use so many
-                            digits of pi like this x+generate_pi(16) for 16 digits. We could in place of every
-                            magic number use a generator to be able to fine tune how everything is generated and
-                            applied. To keep everything constantant we could use generators for every number and
-                            treat operators as functions and use things like lazy evaluation,
-                            strict evaluation... to direction the flow of are logic for whatever we are doing.
-                            You can read about this kind of stuff in
-                            <a href="https://mitp-content-server.mit.edu/books/content/sectbyfn/books_pres_0/6515/sicp.zip/index.html" target="_blank">
-                                Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs</a>.
-                        </p>
-                    </td>
-                </tr>
-            </table>
+        <table border="1" width="60%">
+            <tr>
+                <td>
+                    <h2 id="dialectics">The dialectics</h2>
+                    <p>
+                        Still to come
+                    </p>
+                </td>
+            </tr>
+        </table>
 
-            <table border="1" width="60%">
-                <tr>
-                    <td>
-                        <h2 id="applied">The applied</h2>
-                        <p>
-                            Still to come
-                        </p>
-                    </td>
-                </tr>
-            </table>
+        <table border="1" width="60%">
+            <tr>
+                <td>
+                    <h2 id="applied">The applied</h2>
+                    <p>
+                        Still to come
+                    </p>
+                </td>
+            </tr>
         </table>
       
     </center>