Better blog format

1 files changed, 4 insertions, 8 deletions

diff --git a/org/blog/articles/in-defence-of-bad-spelling.xml b/org/blog/articles/in-defence-of-bad-spelling.xml
index 0ca715a..abaa3bc 100644
--- a/org/blog/articles/in-defence-of-bad-spelling.xml
+++ b/org/blog/articles/in-defence-of-bad-spelling.xml
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
     reading it out loud).
   </p>
 
-  <h3>How does proper spelling and <i>grammer</i> get created?</h3>
+  <h2>How does proper spelling and <i>grammer</i> get created?</h2>
   <ol>
     <li>A person a long time ago throws shit at the wall.</li>
     <li>That shit dries up and stays on the wall.</li>
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@
     crying to me your language is somehow better.
   </p>
 
-  <h3>How adding standards to natural languages creates newspeak</h3>
+  <h2>How adding standards to natural languages creates newspeak</h2>
   <p>
     When they decide what is shit and what is <i>cement</i> they are carving
     out a shape they find pleasing from the terrible flesh monster of a natural
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@
     taming natural language isnt the way forward.
   </p>
 
-  <h3><i>But actually constructed languages are newspeak</i></h3>
+  <h2><i>But actually constructed languages are newspeak</i></h2>
   <p>
     Yes, they can be. Though what gives carving down a natural language for
     mind control its edge is 1: its pre-existing cultural context, 2: its ease
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@
     lisp and less like java and c++.</b> Newspeak would be python lol.
   </p>
 
-  <h3>Commit language vandalism</h3>
+  <h2>Commit language vandalism</h2>
   <p>
     Lets face it, people will not give up their faulty natural languages let
     alone agree on a single constructed language or even a handfull. Its time
@@ -68,7 +68,3 @@
     get so out of hand we will be forced to switch to a constructed language.
   </p>
 </article>
-
-agressivve
-  </p>
-</article>