diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'org/blog/articles/in-defence-of-bad-spelling.xml')
| -rw-r--r-- | org/blog/articles/in-defence-of-bad-spelling.xml | 12 |
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/org/blog/articles/in-defence-of-bad-spelling.xml b/org/blog/articles/in-defence-of-bad-spelling.xml index 0ca715a..abaa3bc 100644 --- a/org/blog/articles/in-defence-of-bad-spelling.xml +++ b/org/blog/articles/in-defence-of-bad-spelling.xml @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ reading it out loud). </p> - <h3>How does proper spelling and <i>grammer</i> get created?</h3> + <h2>How does proper spelling and <i>grammer</i> get created?</h2> <ol> <li>A person a long time ago throws shit at the wall.</li> <li>That shit dries up and stays on the wall.</li> @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ crying to me your language is somehow better. </p> - <h3>How adding standards to natural languages creates newspeak</h3> + <h2>How adding standards to natural languages creates newspeak</h2> <p> When they decide what is shit and what is <i>cement</i> they are carving out a shape they find pleasing from the terrible flesh monster of a natural @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ taming natural language isnt the way forward. </p> - <h3><i>But actually constructed languages are newspeak</i></h3> + <h2><i>But actually constructed languages are newspeak</i></h2> <p> Yes, they can be. Though what gives carving down a natural language for mind control its edge is 1: its pre-existing cultural context, 2: its ease @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ lisp and less like java and c++.</b> Newspeak would be python lol. </p> - <h3>Commit language vandalism</h3> + <h2>Commit language vandalism</h2> <p> Lets face it, people will not give up their faulty natural languages let alone agree on a single constructed language or even a handfull. Its time @@ -68,7 +68,3 @@ get so out of hand we will be forced to switch to a constructed language. </p> </article> - -agressivve - </p> -</article> |