diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'org/blog/articles')
| -rw-r--r-- | org/blog/articles/depression.txt | 74 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | org/blog/articles/depression.xml | 64 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | org/blog/articles/the-software-design-crisis.txt | 85 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | org/blog/articles/the-software-design-crisis.xml | 99 |
4 files changed, 319 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/org/blog/articles/depression.txt b/org/blog/articles/depression.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..406e88e --- /dev/null +++ b/org/blog/articles/depression.txt @@ -0,0 +1,74 @@ +### My depression + +I been depressed since I was a young stuppa little child. I will be depressed +until the day I die unless something really big chances. With people I often +hide it because when people know someone has depression they go out of their +way to make that depression worse. Online on the other hand I can freely share +that information, because for the most part I keep real life and my online +life separate. Also I dont have to interact with any of you fucks! Back when I +was using some mainstream platforms like reddit I would get messaged with +_sillycide_ prevention and other mental health resources, told I just need to +_lift myself up by the bootstraps_ , and other bullshit. Luckily its less of +an issue on the indie web but when talking to people in real life or on +mainstream web about this and they act like they understand because they been +sad before though they word it as depression. Short term being sad is at least +as bad if not worse than being depressed though they were still sad for X +amount of time because of X event. Having depression is more like constantly +feeling yicky inside and out, being emotionally dull, not wanting to do +anything... long term with any moment that isnt like this being the exception +not the norm, the cause being a constant always happening in the background +often outside of control. Comparing sadness to depression is like comparing a +injury that heals well to chronic pain. Its insulting that most people see +them as the same. Go fuck yourself. + +### The cause of depression + +Most cases of depression are caused by systematic oppression of people who +dont wear rose tinted glasses. Psychologists and society in general act like +"how come anyone be depressed when the world is sun shine and rainbows?" so +they concluded depression is a internal issue, that its a chemical in-balance +or peeps just having "the wrong mindset". This isnt a mistake on their part +either. Society fucking sucks by design as a means of control. Read 1984 (: +And psychologists job is to enforce the status quo of society which means only +serving to keep the masses inline and the elites in condition to rule. **A +society that sucks causes depression, who would have ever guested?! And when +people are depressed they have less will to do things. People who dont have a +will to do things arent a threat to the ruling class.** How do psychologists +treat people with depression? They give antidepressants that puts their geist +to sleep and makes them constantly spaced out. They could be using +psychedelics to treat depression which are much more effective anyways though +not even drugs that do work can cure it due to what I already said: the issue +is with society not the people! Though if enough people are taking +psychedelics it may encourage them to fix the underling issue with this world. +That almost happened in the counter-culture movement though the ruling class +was able to weaponize the hippies with _neoconformity_ which I have talked +about here before. Now marijuana is the drug everyone loves. Dont get me wrong +it can have the types of thought provoking effects that open minds but unlike +more powerful psychedelics it requires an active effort on part of the user. +Ketamine used for therapy you say? I got a report from a comrade that ketamine +fucking sucks so they use it to turn people away from better drugs. + +### Things are no different in old times and modern ones + +In the _ye old times_ they were giving peeps lobotomys. Now days we give them +prescriptions that do more harm than good most of the time, mind numbingly +stuppa feel good stories, and a bunch of advice that is helpful for people +going through a sad spot but for depressed peeps is so low on the things to +try list that its insulting. **You really think after years of depression I +never tried drinking water and going outside? Go fuck yourself.** Its like +telling someone with brain cancer that ibuprofen will fix them right up. This +whole fake fix thing is so out of hand people are unironically saying _have +you ever tried not being depressed?_ Everyone is acting like depression is a +new thing. Just pick up a history book and read all about all the depressed +people you dumbass. They were always drunk to because they only had liquor to +kill their geist while now days we have antidepressants. Go to war and die the +most terrible ways possible? Life sucks always just bring along a bottle of +opium cola and nod off while your body gets pumped with lead. They lived short +lives full of war and terrible work conditions and the only pleasure they had +was drunken unprotected sex which created more people who would live short +shitty lifes. Now days with mildly better conditions we have ways to +systematically cause depression because couldnt have people not feeling like +shit! + +**GO FUCK YOURSELF** + diff --git a/org/blog/articles/depression.xml b/org/blog/articles/depression.xml index f6c6702..d0c384d 100644 --- a/org/blog/articles/depression.xml +++ b/org/blog/articles/depression.xml @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@ <article> + <h3>My depression</h3> <p> I been depressed since I was a young stuppa little child. I will be depressed until the day I die unless something really big chances. With @@ -7,8 +8,8 @@ I can freely share that information, because for the most part I keep real life and my online life separate. Also I dont have to interact with any of you fucks! Back when I was using some mainstream platforms like reddit I - would get messaged with <s>sillycide</s> prevention and other mental health - resources, told I just need to <s>lift myself up by the bootstraps</s>, and + would get messaged with <i>sillycide</i> prevention and other mental health + resources, told I just need to <i>lift myself up by the bootstraps</i>, and other bullshit. Luckily its less of an issue on the indie web but when talking to people in real life or on mainstream web about this and they act like they understand because they been sad before though they word it as @@ -16,10 +17,67 @@ depressed though they were still sad for X amount of time because of X event. Having depression is more like constantly feeling yicky inside and out, being emotionally dull, not wanting to do anything... long term with - any moment that isnt like this being the exception not the norm. The cause + any moment that isnt like this being the exception not the norm, the cause being a constant always happening in the background often outside of control. Comparing sadness to depression is like comparing a injury that heals well to chronic pain. Its insulting that most people see them as the same. Go fuck yourself. </p> + + <h3>The cause of depression</h3> + <p> + Most cases of depression are caused by + systematic oppression of people who dont wear rose tinted + glasses. Psychologists and society in general act like "how come anyone be + depressed when the world is sun shine and rainbows?" so they concluded + depression is a internal issue, that its a chemical in-balance or peeps + just having "the wrong mindset". This isnt a mistake on their part + either. Society fucking sucks by design as a means of control. Read 1984 (: + And psychologists job is to enforce the status quo of society which means + only serving to keep the masses inline and the elites in condition to + rule. <b>A society that sucks causes depression, who would have ever + guested?! And when people are depressed they have less will to do + things. People who dont have a will to do things arent a threat to the + ruling class.</b> How do psychologists treat people with depression? They + give antidepressants that puts their geist to sleep and makes them + constantly spaced out. They could be using psychedelics to treat depression + which are much more effective anyways though not even drugs that do work + can cure it due to what I already said: the issue is with society not the + people! Though if enough people are taking psychedelics it may encourage + them to fix the underling issue with this world. That almost happened in + the counter-culture movement though the ruling class was able to weaponize + the hippies with <i>neoconformity</i> which I have talked about here + before. Now marijuana is the drug everyone loves. Dont get me wrong it can + have the types of thought provoking effects that open minds but unlike more + powerful psychedelics it requires an active effort on part of the + user. Ketamine used for therapy you say? I got a report from a comrade that + ketamine fucking sucks so they use it to turn people away from better + drugs. + </p> + + <h3>Things are no different in old times and modern ones</h3> + <p> + In the <i>ye old times</i> they were giving peeps lobotomys. Now days we + give them prescriptions that do more harm than good most of the time, mind + numbingly stuppa feel good stories, and a bunch of advice that is helpful + for people going through a sad spot but for depressed peeps is so low on + the things to try list that its insulting. <b>You really think after years + of depression I never tried drinking water and going outside? Go fuck + yourself.</b> Its like telling someone with brain cancer that ibuprofen + will fix them right up. This whole fake fix thing is so out of hand people + are unironically saying <i>have you ever tried not being depressed?</i> + Everyone is acting like depression is a new thing. Just pick up a history + book and read all about all the depressed people you dumbass. They were + always drunk to because they only had liquor to kill their geist while now + days we have antidepressants. Go to war and die the most terrible ways + possible? Life sucks always just bring along a bottle of opium cola and nod + off while your body gets pumped with lead. They lived short lives full of + war and terrible work conditions and the only pleasure they had was drunken + unprotected sex which created more people who would live short shitty + lifes. Now days with mildly better conditions we have ways to + systematically cause depression because couldnt have people not feeling + like shit! + <br/><br/> + <b>GO FUCK YOURSELF</b> + </p> </article> diff --git a/org/blog/articles/the-software-design-crisis.txt b/org/blog/articles/the-software-design-crisis.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..96b0ede --- /dev/null +++ b/org/blog/articles/the-software-design-crisis.txt @@ -0,0 +1,85 @@ +**Warning: this is more of a roast if anything** + +Have you ever had an update for a piece of software that removes features +without any usable replacement or way to get it back? What about options being +pulled from the setting? Don't get me started on desktop software using mobile +UI design. + +### Mobile UI design leaking into desktop space + +Mobile phones are operated with touch screen, and have screens that are small +and taller than they are wide. Desktops are operated with a keyboard and +mouse, and have large screens that are wider than they are tall. Because of +that, its quite safe to say that **software optimized for one platform isnt't +so great on another**. Are you still following? Likely not, but if you are +consider this: why do many modern desktop programs look like mobile apps? Some +of them are mobile apps ported to desktop though many of them don't even work +on mobile. The answers are modern UX, the web, and _GNOMEism_. + +### Modern UX + +**Modern UX isn't about making professional software. It's about making +software that looks like it was made by a professional.** This means flat +interfaces and lack of customization. Modern developers are like super +entitled chefs. "How dare you put table salt on a meal that is already +perfect", "ketchup? what are you a picky eater?!"... They act like your lucky +for even getting a dark and light mode when the toolkits they use have +themeing. Yes, I know adding more options makes it difficult to debug but hear +me out: all the basic things can be in the settings menu while everything else +can be in a config file or interface similar to _about:config_. The normies +get their easy settings while power users can change what they want. For +separate mobile and desktop interfaces use a [model-view- +controller](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Model%E2%80%93view%E2%80%93controller). +**The UI is nearly how the user interacts with the program, not the program +itself.** MVC allows you to isolated different parts of your program making it +more flexible. Before you go saying MVC is too difficult I had a teacher who +made us use MVC in a beginner course with some students who never programmed +before. By the end we were all able to design and make software this way. What +do you tell users on closed source platforms that actively make development +harder? **Go fuck yourself.** + +### The web + +The web uses html, css, and javascript. The first two being usable standards +for creating webpages, and the third being a buggy programming language +integrated into the first two. Many developers decided to use those to make +software since its cross platform and doesn't require the user to install +their software. Though web apps have issues with bandwidth, security, and +integration into operating systems. They encouraged mass produced slop. Web +architecture has spyware built in by design by governments and corporations. +The fixes include disabling javascript, cookies, webrtc, webgl... Though these +are things web apps depend on, **because its spyware by design**. This website +doesn't depend on those things. All it needs is html and optional css. This +ties into modern UX design since web developers like to define new standards +that are worse than the long standing ones. What about new standards that are +better than the old ones? Web developers never do that. This is because **web +developers aren't software engineers yet their choices effect the software +development world since they create much of the software normies use which +creates expectations for what modern software should look like**. + +### GNOMEism + +Gnome is a desktop envirtment that is pretty much standard on linux. A while +back they said [ please don't theme our apps](https://stopthemingmy.app/). +Sounds a lot like the entitled chef thing I brought up rofl. Someone made [ do +not resize our windows](https://webb.is-a.dev/do-not-resize/) as a parody of +gnome. People thought it was real because **it strangely sounds like something +gnome developers would actually say**. Gnome tries to strike a fine balance +between mobile and desktop platforms and ends up failing at both. Want to know +what linux desktop has the most amount of forks? Its gnome! Sure that's a +given since its the most common desktop but just compare it to kde forks for a +sense of scale. + +### Accessibly + +This isn't really something most developers think of yet is one of the most +important things in software development. You software developers are all dumb +fucks but please stay away from doing anything hacky on the UI side. It can +really fuck over things like screen readers. **The UI is nearly how the user +interacts with the program, not the program itself.** Just pick a UI toolkit +that fits your needs and use it in a sane manner and things will work +correctly. Software developers a lot like web developers but not to the same +degree create problems for themselves that once fixed created two more +problems. When accessibly is already low on their list and that is how they +work things will for sure be a shit show. + diff --git a/org/blog/articles/the-software-design-crisis.xml b/org/blog/articles/the-software-design-crisis.xml new file mode 100644 index 0000000..7e31b9a --- /dev/null +++ b/org/blog/articles/the-software-design-crisis.xml @@ -0,0 +1,99 @@ +<article> + <p> + <b>Warning: this is more of a roast if anything</b> + </p> + <p> + Have you ever had an update for a piece of software that removes features + without any usable replacement or way to get it back? What about options + being pulled from the setting? Don't get me started on desktop software + using mobile UI design. + </p> + + <h3>Mobile UI design leaking into desktop space</h3> + <p> + Mobile phones are operated with touch screen, and have screens that are + small and taller than they are wide. Desktops are operated with a keyboard + and mouse, and have large screens that are wider than they are + tall. Because of that, its quite safe to say that <b>software optimized for + one platform isnt't so great on another</b>. Are you still following? + Likely not, but if you are consider this: why do many modern desktop + programs look like mobile apps? Some of them are mobile apps ported to + desktop though many of them don't even work on mobile. The answers are + modern UX, the web, and <i>GNOMEism</i>. + </p> + + <h3>Modern UX</h3> + <p> + <b>Modern UX isn't about making professional software. It's about making + software that looks like it was made by a professional.</b> This means flat + interfaces and lack of customization. Modern developers are like super + entitled chefs. "How dare you put table salt on a meal that is already + perfect", "ketchup? what are you a picky eater?!"... They act like your + lucky for even getting a dark and light mode when the toolkits they use + have themeing. Yes, I know adding more options makes it difficult to debug + but hear me out: all the basic things can be in the settings menu while + everything else can be in a config file or interface similar to + <i>about:config</i>. The normies get their easy settings while power users + can change what they want. For separate mobile and desktop interfaces use a + <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Model%E2%80%93view%E2%80%93controller" + target="_blank">model-view-controller</a>. <b>The UI is nearly how the + user interacts with the program, not the program itself.</b> MVC allows you + to isolated different parts of your program making it more flexible. Before + you go saying MVC is too difficult I had a teacher who made us use MVC in a + beginner course with some students who never programmed before. By the end + we were all able to design and make software this way. What do you tell + users on closed source platforms that actively make development harder? + <b>Go fuck yourself.</b> + </p> + + <h3>The web</h3> + <p> + The web uses html, css, and javascript. The first two being usable + standards for creating webpages, and the third being a buggy programming + language integrated into the first two. Many developers decided to use + those to make software since its cross platform and doesn't require the + user to install their software. Though web apps have issues with bandwidth, + security, and integration into operating systems. They encouraged mass + produced slop. Web architecture has spyware built in by design by + governments and corporations. The fixes include disabling javascript, + cookies, webrtc, webgl... Though these are things web apps depend + on, <b>because its spyware by design</b>. This website doesn't depend on + those things. All it needs is html and optional css. This ties into modern + UX design since web developers like to define new standards that are worse + than the long standing ones. What about new standards that are better than + the old ones? Web developers never do that. This is because <b>web + developers aren't software engineers yet their choices effect the software + development world since they create much of the software normies use which + creates expectations for what modern software should look like</b>. + </p> + + <h3>GNOMEism</h3> + <p> + Gnome is a desktop envirtment that is pretty much standard on linux. A + while back they said <a href="https://stopthemingmy.app/" target="_blank"> + please don't theme our apps</a>. Sounds a lot like the entitled chef thing + I brought up rofl. Someone made + <a href="https://webb.is-a.dev/do-not-resize/" target="_blank"> + do not resize our windows</a> + as a parody of gnome. People thought it was real because <b>it strangely + sounds like something gnome developers would actually say</b>. Gnome tries + to strike a fine balance between mobile and desktop platforms and ends up + failing at both. Want to know what linux desktop has the most amount of + forks? Its gnome! Sure that's a given since its the most common desktop but + just compare it to kde forks for a sense of scale. + </p> + + <h3>Accessibly</h3> + <p> + This isn't really something most developers think of yet is one of the most + important things in software development. You software developers are all + dumb fucks but please stay away from doing anything hacky on the UI + side. It can really fuck over things like screen readers. <b>The UI is + nearly how the user interacts with the program, not the program itself.</b> + Just pick a UI toolkit that fits your needs and use it in a sane manner and + things will work correctly. Software developers a lot like web developers + but not to the same degree create problems for themselves that once fixed + created two more problems. When accessibly is already low on their list and + that is how they work things will for sure be a shit show. + </p> +</article> |